Leon FL Lawyers | Marc Anthony Drexler -- eLawyers

10-008902 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs FIVE STAR HAITIAN RESTAURANT (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 03, 2010

The issue for determination is whether Respondent committed the offenses set forth in the Administrative Complaint dated December 2, 2009, and, if so, what action should be taken.Petitioner demonstrated Respondent had no certified food manager, no proof of employee training, and no proper hand drying provisions at the hand washing sink; and new owner failed to submit change of ownership application. Recommend admininstrative fine.

10-008904 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs TERIYAKI CAFE SUSHI AND GRILL (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 03, 2010

The issues are whether Respondent committed food service violations, and, if so, whether disciplinary action should be taken. For the reasons set forth below, Respondent did commit violations and should be subject to the fine described herein.The Division proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated several provisions relating to food safety and cleanliness. A fine of $1,300 is warranted.

10-002427 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs TASTE OF SAIGON II (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 04, 2010

The issues are as follows: (a) whether Respondent violated Chapter 509, Florida Statutes, and specific provisions of the Food Code, 2001, Recommendations of the United States Public Health Service/Food and Drug Administration (Food Code), adopted by reference in Florida Administrative Code Rule 61C-1.001(14); and, if so, (b) what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner presented clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated Chapter 509, Florida Statutes, and numerous provisions of the Food Code.

10-003294 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs TASTE OF SAIGON II (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 15, 2010

The issues are as follows: (a) whether Respondent violated Chapter 509, Florida Statutes, and specific provisions of the Food Code, 2001, Recommendations of the United States Public Health Service/Food and Drug Administration (Food Code), adopted by reference in Florida Administrative Code Rule 61C-1.001(14); and, if so, (b) what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner presented clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated Chapter 509, Florida Statutes, and numerous provisions of the Food Code.

10-005922 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs C AND K SMOKE HOUSE BBQ (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 20, 2010

The issues in this case are whether Respondent committed the violation alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent violated rule requiring plan approval to remodel restaurant. Respondent replaced old equipment with like equipment in the same general area, without construction or alteration of any structure.

11-000436 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs MIAMI SUBS GRILL (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 25, 2011

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, the penalties that should be imposed.Restaurant should be fined for three critical violations of the Food Code.

11-002599 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs GIGI'S CAFE (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 23, 2011

The issue is whether Respondent, in the operation of a public food establishment, is guilty of various violations of the law governing such establishments and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Revocation for licensee that committed numerous critical violations of the Food Code.

16-003010 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs RAHAF FOOD SERVICE, INC., D/B/A HOOK FISH AND CHICKEN (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 01, 2016

At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint, dated January 25, 2016; and, if so, what penalty is warranted.The Division proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent committed the food safety violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint.

16-002758 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs CASA MEXICANA RESTAURANT, INC., D/B/A CASA MEXICANA RESTAURANT, INC. (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 18, 2016

Whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaint filed by the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants (Petitioner), against Casa Mexicana Restaurant, Inc., d/b/a Casa Mexicana Restaurant, Inc. (Respondent), are correct, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Code violations support upward deviation of penalty.

16-001603 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs BENITEL EDDIE JOEL PEREZ, D/B/A LOS GORDITOS NO. 2 (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 21, 2016

The issues in this matter are whether Respondent was out of compliance with the food safety requirements of chapter 509, Florida Statutes (2016),1/ and the implementing administrative rules of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants; and, if so, what disciplinary action is appropriate.Respondent's violation of food safety requirements of chapter 509, Florida Statutes, and implementing rules warrants an administrative fine.

Marc Anthony Drexler