Leon FL Lawyers | Marc Anthony Drexler -- eLawyers

13-002954 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs HOLLAND APARTMENTS (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 09, 2013

Petitioner proved that Respondent apartment complex was in violation of agency rules. Mitigating circumstances existed as units were unoccupied and not held out for rent.

13-003847 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs OASIS CAFE AT KEY BISCAYNE (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 02, 2013

13-001751 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs JKL'S DELIGHT (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 14, 2013

The issues in this disciplinary proceeding arise from Petitioner's allegation that Respondent, a licensed restaurant, violated several rules and a statutory provision governing food service establishments. If Petitioner proves one or more of the alleged violations, then it will be necessary to consider whether penalties should be imposed on Respondent.Clear and convincing evidence that Respondent committed two violations of the Food Code; insufficient evidence as to count three. In light of Respondent's lack of disciplinary history, recommend a mitigated total fine of $300.

13-000762 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs MAGGIE QI (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 28, 2013

The issue in this case is whether on March 23, 2012, July 31, 2012, and October 10, 2012, Respondent was out of compliance with the food safety requirements of section 509.032, Florida Statutes, and implementing administrative rules of the Division of Hotels and Restaurants of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, what penalty is appropriate.Respondent's violations of food safety requirements of chapter 509, Florida Statutes, and implementing rules warrant administrative fine.

13-000807 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs EL CRAZY POLLO LATIN GRILL (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 07, 2013

Whether Respondent violated the Food Code by failing to control pests; and, if so, the appropriate penalty.Restaurant violated the food code by failing to control roach infestation; and fined $1,000.00 as a repeat offender.

13-000446 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs CARINA'S STONE FIRED PIZZA-GELATO (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 31, 2013

The issues in this disciplinary proceeding arise from Petitioner's allegation that Respondent, a licensed restaurant, violated several rules and a statutory provision governing food service establishments. If Petitioner proves one or more of the alleged violations, then it will be necessary to consider whether penalties should be imposed on Respondent.Clear and convincing evidence that Respondent committed five critical violations, as well as one non-critical violation. In light of Respondent's lack of disciplinary history, mitigated total fine of $1,100 is recommended.

12-003871 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs SUBWAY NO. 32148 (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 29, 2012

At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent committed the violation alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated October 2, 2012, and, if so, what penalty is warranted.Petitioner proved roach infestation in Respondent's restaurant, a critical violation of the Food Code; recommend $500 fine.

13-000239 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs ST. JOHNS SEAFOOD AND OYSTER BAR (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 17, 2013

The issue in this case is whether on January 26, August 27, and August 28, 2012, Respondent was in compliance with the food safety requirements of section 509.032, Florida Statutes, and implementing administrative rules of the Division of Hotels and Restaurants of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, and if not, what penalty is appropriate.Respondent's third critical violation of food safety requirements and violation of licensure renewal requirements of chapter 509, Florida Statutes, and implementing administrative rules, warrant $1,500 fine.

13-000105 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs PATIO (THE) (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 09, 2013

Whether Respondent violated food safety standards established by section 509.032, Florida Statutes, and the implementing rules as charged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, the appropriate sanctions.Respondent violated the Food Code by failing to maintain cold food at the required temperature warranting imposition of a penalty.

12-003536 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs PHYLLIS MURRAY UNLICENSED MOBILE VENDOR (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 31, 2012

Whether Respondent operated a public food service establishment without a valid license and, if so, the appropriate sanctions.Administrative fine of $500 is appropriate for Respondent's operating a public food service establishment (mobile food-dispensing unit) without a license from the Department of Business and Professional Regulation.

Marc Anthony Drexler