Hillsborough FL Lawyers | Margaret S Russell -- eLawyers

Lamb v. Northern Investment Corp. (1936)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 1936 Citations: 127 Fla. 901

Appeal dismissed on motion of counsel for Appellee.

State, Ex Rel. v. S. H. Kress Co. (1934)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 08, 1934

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 191 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] An information in the nature of quo warranto was filed in this Court, September, 1933. Its purpose was to obtain an order to oust S. H. Kress Company, a foreign corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State o..

State, Ex Rel. v. S. H. Kress Co. (1934)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 08, 1934

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 191 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] An information in the nature of quo warranto was filed in this Court, September, 1933. Its purpose was to obtain an order to oust S. H. Kress Company, a foreign corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State o..

State, Ex Rel. v. S. H. Kress Co. (1934)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 08, 1934

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 191 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] An information in the nature of quo warranto was filed in this Court, September, 1933. Its purpose was to obtain an order to oust S. H. Kress Company, a foreign corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State o..

97-15535 (1998)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: Apr. 15, 1998

141 F.3d 1295 46 U.S.P.Q.2d 1437, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2757 , 98 D.A.R. 3811 BLOCKBUSTER VIDEOS, INC., a Texas corporation; Video Update, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF TEMPE, a municipal subdivision of the State of Arizona, Defendant-Appellant. No. 97-15535. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 16, 1997. Decided April 15, 1998. Clifford L. Mattice and David Merkel, Office of the City Attorney, Tempe, AZ, for defendant-appel..

Margaret S Russell

Lamb v. Northern Investment Corp. (1936)

State, Ex Rel. v. S. H. Kress Co. (1934)

State, Ex Rel. v. S. H. Kress Co. (1934)

State, Ex Rel. v. S. H. Kress Co. (1934)

97-15535 (1998)

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Search for lawyers by practice areas.