welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Maria E DeLiberato
Maria E DeLiberato
Maria E DeLiberato
Visitors: 62
0
Bar #664251(FL)     License for 22 years
Tampa FL

Are you Maria E DeLiberato? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

  Fletcher v. Osban  (1948)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 17, 1948 Citations: 38 So. 2d 138
Affirmed.
  State, Ex Rel. v. Harvey  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 13, 1936 Citations: 125 Fla. 742, 170 So. 153
The pleadings and statute involved are stated in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice BUFORD. *Page 743 Chapter 17257, Acts of 1935, provides for licensing and regulating as well as for taxing defined machines commonly called "slot machines" in the several counties of this State; and the provision of the statute that after the polling of a stated vote in any county at a general election, no such machines shall be licensed to operate in such county, is not an unlawful delegation of legislative powe..
  State, Ex Rel. v. Harvey  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 13, 1936 Citations: 125 Fla. 742, 170 So. 153
The pleadings and statute involved are stated in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice BUFORD. *Page 743 Chapter 17257, Acts of 1935, provides for licensing and regulating as well as for taxing defined machines commonly called "slot machines" in the several counties of this State; and the provision of the statute that after the polling of a stated vote in any county at a general election, no such machines shall be licensed to operate in such county, is not an unlawful delegation of legislative powe..
  Hecht v. Wilson  (1932)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 15, 1932 Citations: 107 Fla. 421, 144 So. 886
The appellee, complainant below, filed her bill to foreclose a $10,500.00 mortgage upon certain lands *Page 422 described in her bill. The mortgagors were made parties defendant. But in addition to the mortgagors, there were others made parties defendant because (so it is alleged) they claimed some right, title or interest in the property which was alleged to be inferior and subordinate to the claim of foreclosure being advanced by the mortgagee. These added defendants were the Trustees of the In..
  Hecht v. Wilson  (1932)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 15, 1932 Citations: 107 Fla. 421, 144 So. 886
The appellee, complainant below, filed her bill to foreclose a $10,500.00 mortgage upon certain lands *Page 422 described in her bill. The mortgagors were made parties defendant. But in addition to the mortgagors, there were others made parties defendant because (so it is alleged) they claimed some right, title or interest in the property which was alleged to be inferior and subordinate to the claim of foreclosure being advanced by the mortgagee. These added defendants were the Trustees of the In..
  Morrison v. Farnell  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 02, 1936 Citations: 126 Fla. 385, 171 So. 528
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 387 In this case transcript of record was filed in this Court on July 1st, 1936. The last briefs were filed on August 12th, 1936, and the Court, on motion, because of the public interest involved and the emergency apparent advanced the case on the docket and heard oral argument En Banc on September 15th, 1936. On this afternoon, of November 12th, 1936, the cas..
  Morrison v. Farnell  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 02, 1936 Citations: 126 Fla. 385, 171 So. 528
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 387 In this case transcript of record was filed in this Court on July 1st, 1936. The last briefs were filed on August 12th, 1936, and the Court, on motion, because of the public interest involved and the emergency apparent advanced the case on the docket and heard oral argument En Banc on September 15th, 1936. On this afternoon, of November 12th, 1936, the cas..
  C. J. Holleman Co. v. Harrington Prop., Inc.  (1927)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 13, 1927 Citations: 113 So. 640, 94 Fla. 196
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affi..
  State, Ex Rel. v. Harvey  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 13, 1936 Citations: 125 Fla. 742, 170 So. 153
The pleadings and statute involved are stated in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice BUFORD. *Page 743 Chapter 17257, Acts of 1935, provides for licensing and regulating as well as for taxing defined machines commonly called "slot machines" in the several counties of this State; and the provision of the statute that after the polling of a stated vote in any county at a general election, no such machines shall be licensed to operate in such county, is not an unlawful delegation of legislative powe..
  State, Ex Rel. v. Peacock  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 27, 1936 Citations: 125 Fla. 810, 170 So. 309
Titus and Beers were candidates at the 1936 June Democratic Primary Election for nomination to the office of Justice of the Peace of the Eighth District of Volusia County. Beers has been declared the nominee under a recanvass of the votes made by the Volusia County Canvassing Board, the respondents herein, after a recount conducted under the order of this Court granted following a tie vote between the candidates shown by the original election returns. The situation now is, as shown by the *Page 8..

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer