Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Mark A. Seff
Mark A. Seff
Visitors: 28
2

Free initial consultation

Bar #246018(FL)     License for 47 years; Member in Good Standing
Hollywood FL

Are you Mark A. Seff? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

15-4230  Wynona Davis Carpenter v. State of Florida  (2016)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 06, 2016
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA WYNONA DAVIS CARPENTER, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-4230 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed July 7, 2016. An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. Michael Flowers, Judge. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Wynona Davis Carpenter, pr..
89-230-CIV-T-17(C)  Gerber v. Longboat Harbour North Condominium  (1989)
District Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Nov. 17, 1989 Citations: 724 F. Supp. 884
724 F. Supp. 884 (1989) Allen J. GERBER and Doris Pickett, Plaintiffs, v. LONGBOAT HARBOUR NORTH CONDOMINIUM, INC., Defendant. No. 89-230-CIV-T-17(C). United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. November 17, 1989. *885 James J. Boczar, P.A., Simon Rosin, P.A., and Paul L. Wean, Trial Counsel, Becker, Poliakoff & Streitfeld, P.A., Sarasota, Fla., for plaintiffs. ORDER KOVACHEVICH, District Judge. This cause is before the Court upon Defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Ci..
88-287-CIV-T-15A  Hernandez v. Dugger  (1993)
District Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Dec. 08, 1993 Citations: 839 F. Supp. 849
839 F. Supp. 849 (1993) Herbert HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Richard L. DUGGER, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent. No. 88-287-CIV-T-15A. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. December 8, 1993. *850 James E. Felman and Stuart C. Markman of Kynes & Markman, Tampa, FL, for petitioner. Carol M. Dittmar, Atty. General's Office, Tampa Crim. Div., Tampa, FL, for respondent. ORDER GRANTING STAY PENDING APPEAL MERRYDAY, District Judge. Hernandez's petiti..
85-418  Graham v. State  (1985)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 13, 1985 Citations: 479 So. 2d 824
479 So. 2d 824 (1985) Charles GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 85-418. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. December 13, 1985. *825 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Ann N. Radabaugh, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corces, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee. GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge. Appellant was convicted of robbery in violation of section 812.13, Florida Statutes (1983). On a..
83-003279  JOHN J. BURTON AND THOMAS G. WRIGHT, JR. vs. SONOMA INTERNATIONAL, CLAUDETTE BRUCK, AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1983)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Apr. 16, 1984
This case concerns the issue of whether the Respondents, Sonoma International and Claudette Bruck, should be granted a site approval by the Department of Transportation for the establishment of a private use airport in an unincorporated area of Palm Beach County. At the formal hearing, the Petitioner, Burton, called as witnesses John J. Burton, Burkett Neely, Jr., and Andrew Daniluk. Petitioner Florida National Properties called as its only witness, Harold R. Sanders. The Respondent Sonoma International called as witnesses Claudette Bruck and Roth Inglefried. The Department of Transportation called as witnesses Thomas Boswell, Herbert L. Brown, and William H. Stockton. Petitioner Burton offered and had admitted 11 exhibits. Burton's Exhibits 4 and 5 were admitted for the limited purpose of showing the relative locations of the Petitioner's property and the proposed site and Burton's Exhibit 10 was admitted for demonstrative purposes only. Petitioner Florida National Properties offered and had admitted one exhibit. The applicant, Sonoma International and Claudette Bruck, offered and had admitted seven exhibits and the Department of Transportation offered and had admitted eight exhibits. Counsel for each of the Petitioners and each of the Respondents submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law for consideration by the Bearing Officer. To the extent that those proposed findings and conclusions are inconsistent with the findings and conclusions in this order, they were considered by the Hearing Officer and rejected as not supported by the evidence or as unnecessary to the resolution of this cause.Respondent should be granted site approval for private airport. Site approval consideration must only look for compliance with standards.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer