welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Mark D Shuman
Mark D Shuman
Mark D Shuman
Visitors: 42
0
Bar #147869(FL)     License for 26 years; Member in Good Standing
Melbourne FL

Are you Mark D Shuman? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

15-2126  Gems v. State  (2016)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 2016
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 9, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D15-2126 Lower Tribunal No. 15-948 Thomas Gems, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alberto Milian, Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jill D. Kramer, Assistant Attorney Ge..
93-1490  Forcucci v. United States  (1993)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Dec. 08, 1993
November 1, 1993 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 93-1490 CARMEN FORCUCCI and THERESA FORCUCCI, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Defendant, Appellee.
93-1490  Carmen Forcucci and Theresa Forcucci v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company  (1993)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Nov. 01, 1993 Citations: 11 F.3d 1
11 F.3d 1, Carmen FORCUCCI and Theresa Forcucci, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v.UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Defendant, Appellee. (Counts III and IV). On June 1 counsel wrote with respect to UIM that Goodwin's $100, 000 coverage with Travelers was insufficient.
1444  Harriscom Svenska, Ab v. Harris Corporation and R.F. Systems, a Division of R.F. Communications Group of Harris Corporation  (1993)
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: Aug. 23, 1993 Citations: 3 F.3d 576
3 F.3d 576 HARRISCOM SVENSKA, AB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARRIS CORPORATION and R.F. Systems, A Division of R.F. Communications Group of Harris Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 1443, 1444, Dockets 93-7043, 93-7057. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued May 20, 1993. Decided Aug. 23, 1993. Mark D. Shuman, Boston, MA, for plaintiff-appellant. Richard A. Feinstein, Washington, DC (Alison L. Doyle, Lori L. Jackson, Jonathan L. Diesenhaus, McKenna & Cuneo, of counsel), for def..
91-7291  Harriscom Svenska Ab v. Harris Corporation  (1991)
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: Oct. 18, 1991 Citations: 947 F.2d 627
947 F.2d 627 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1308 HARRISCOM SVENSKA AB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARRIS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 23, Docket 91-7291. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued Sept. 11, 1991. Decided Oct. 18, 1991. Mark D. Shuman, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff-appellant. Allen B. Green (Richard A. Feinstein, Alison L. Doyle, Lori L. Jackson, McKenna & Cuneo, on the brief), Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee. Before KEARSE, MINER, and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges. KEA..
88-1726  Margaret Taylor v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company  (1989)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jan. 23, 1989 Citations: 867 F.2d 705
The question thus presented is: Bearing in mind that the Rhode Island statute concerning compulsory uninsured motorist benefits mandates two limits regarding uninsured motorist coverage, a $25, 000.00 [per person] limit and a $50, 000.00 [per accident] limit ...
84-1642  Micro-Sparc, Inc. v. Michael Weinstock  (1985)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Apr. 03, 1985 Citations: 758 F.2d 790
758 F.2d 790, MICRO-SPARC, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee, v.Michael WEINSTOCK, Defendant, Appellant. At the time the district court made its decision (eight months after Micro-Sparc had moved for summary judgment), Weinstock had filed only his unsupported opposition to Micro-Sparc's motion.
93-1490  Forcucci v. United States  (1993)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Dec. 08, 1993
Mass. G.L. c. 176D, 3(9). We further ask, if plaintiffs consider 30 days, appropriate, may not a fax on the 31st day be equivalent to a, letter mailed on the 30th her claim herein. Plaintiffs' complaint of the magistrate's giving, weight hereto overlooks that the statute expressly permits, it.
94-1848  Dahlawi v. Ramlawi  (1994)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Sep. 14, 1994 Citations: 644 So. 2d 523
644 So. 2d 523 (1994) Amin DAHLAWI, et al., Petitioners, v. Zahid RAMLAWI, Respondent. No. 94-1848. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. September 14, 1994. Rehearing Denied November 23, 1994. Thomson Muraro Razook & Hart, and Parker D. Thomson, and Steven W. Davis, Miami, for petitioners. Bailey Hunt & Jones, and Jesse C. Jones, Miami, for respondent. Before BASKIN, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ. PER CURIAM. Amin Dahlawi, Diana Dahlawi, and Hassan Dahlawi [hereafter collectively referred ..
SC07-2200, SC07-2201  Phantom of Brevard, Inc. v. Brevard County  (2008)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 23, 2008 Citations: 3 So. 3d 309
3 So. 3d 309 (2008) PHANTOM OF BREVARD, INC., Petitioner, v. BREVARD COUNTY, Florida, Respondent. Brevard County, Florida, Petitioner, v. Phantom of Brevard, Inc., Respondent. Nos. SC07-2200, SC07-2201. Supreme Court of Florida. December 23, 2008. Rehearing Denied February 17, 2009. *310 Mark D. Shuman of Gray Robinson, P.A., Melbourne, FL, for Petitioner/Respondent. Scott L. Knox, County Attorney, Viera, FL, for Respondent/Petitioner. CANADY, J. Phantom of Brevard, Inc. and Brevard County seek r..

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer