welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Mark Wilensky
Mark Wilensky
Mark Wilensky
Visitors: 112
1
Bar #290221(FL)     License for 46 years; Member in Good Standing
Wellington FL

Are you Mark Wilensky? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

19-005240PL  RICHARD CORCORAN, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION vs MICHAEL LARKIN  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 02, 2019
Whether Petitioner proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that Respondent violated section 1012.795(1)(d), (g), and (j), Florida Statutes (2014),1 and Florida Administrative Code Rules 6A-10.081(2)(a)1., 6A-10.081(2)(a)5., and 6A-10.081(2)(a)8.2; and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed against Respondent's Florida Educator's Certificate.Petitioner did not prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that Respondent engaged in the conduct, or violated the statute, rules, and school board policy, as charged in the Amended Administrative Complaint. Recommend dismissal of case.
19-006520TTS  PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs DEBRA TURNBULL  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 09, 2019
The issue is whether Respondent, Debra Turnbull’s (“Ms. Turnbull” or “Respondent”), employment with Petitioner, Palm Beach County School Board (“School Board” or “Petitioner”), as an elementary teacher, should be terminated, based upon the statements of the nature of the controversy set forth in the Joint Second Amended Pre-hearing Stipulation filed by the parties.Just cause exists for suspending Respondent without pay for 15 days, but not to skip steps under the progressive discipline doctrine to terminate her employment. She is entitled to back pay and benefits from the time her 15-day suspension would have run.
20-000664PL  RICHARD CORCORAN, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION vs NIKKI WARRIS  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 07, 2020
The issue to be determined in this case is whether Respondent violated section 1012.795(1)(f), (g), and (j), Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 6A-10.081(2)(a)1., 5., and 8., and, 6A- 10.081(2)(b)1., and 3., as alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint. If it is found that Respondent has committed any of the statute or rule violations alleged, the penalty that should be imposed must also be determined.Petitioner failed to prove the allegations in the Amended Administrative Complaint by clear and convincing evidence.
20-002987PL  RICHARD CORCORAN, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION vs RUTH S. GAILLARD LEGER  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 01, 2020
Whether Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent left a kindergarten student, K.M., alone in her classroom on April 2, 2018, as alleged in Petitioner’s Administrative Complaint.Petitioner failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the Respondent's teaching certificate should be sanctioned for her leaving a kindergarten student alone in the classroom when others went to P.E. class.
20-004420PL  RICHARD CORCORAN, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION vs DIANE N. TIRADO  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 05, 2020
Whether Respondent violated the Florida Statutes and Florida Administrative Code rules, as charged in the Amended Administrative Complaint, and if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that Respondent violated rule 6A-10.081, and, consequently, violated section 1012.795. Recommend one year of probation imposed on Respondent's educator's certificate.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer