welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Martin Stephen Turner
Martin Stephen Turner
Martin Stephen Turner
Visitors: 68
0
Bar #95691(FL)     License for 58 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Martin Stephen Turner? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

13-004113BID  CARE ACCESS PSN, LLC vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 2013
The issues in this bid protest are whether, in making the decision to award Intervenor Prestige Health Choice, LLC ("Prestige"), a contract to provide Medicaid managed medical assistance services as a provider service network in Region 11 (covering Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties), Respondent Agency for Health Care Administration ("AHCA") acted contrary to a governing statute, rule, or solicitation specification; and, if so, whether such action was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious. (In this protest, Petitioner Care Access PSN, LLC ("Care Access"), challenges AHCA's intended award to Prestige in Region 11, and only that award. Care Access does not seek to upset any other intended awards in Region 11 or in any other Region.)The agency's intended contract award, being contrary to the statutes and project specifications, is clearly erroneous and should be rescinded.
08-003969BID  THE HENRY AND RILLA WHITE YOUTH FOUNDATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 2008
The issue is whether Respondent's decision to reject all bids in DJJ Solicitation Number: RFP# P2043 was illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent.The decision of Respondent Department of Juvenile Justice to reject all bids was not illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent.
04-002339F  MAVIS R. GEORGALIS vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 06, 2004
What amount of legal fees and costs should be awarded to Petitioner pursuant to Section 120.569(2)(e) or 57.105(5), Florida Statutes, for Respondent’s erroneous classification of Petitioner’s position and subsequent failure to correct that error and reclassify Petitioner’s position back to career service as requested by her in Georgalis v. F.D.O.T., DOAH Case No. 03-4665SED.Counsel for Petitioner is entitled to fees and costs, which are awarded pursuant to Sections 57.105 and 120.569, Florida Statutes.
96-002921  BEVERLY ENTERPRISES-FLORIDA, INC., D/B/A BEVERLY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER - ROSEMONT vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 19, 1996
The issue is whether Respondent properly recalculated Medicaid reimbursement rates for the property costs of several nursing homes operated by Petitioner.Post-October 1, 1985, conveyances of nursing homes, without change of Medicaid provider, don`t require adjustment of Medicaid provider`s Fair Rental Value System (FRVS) reimbursement rate.
95-002648BID  AMDAHL CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 24, 1995
Whether the protest herein is premature under the terms of the Request for Proposals and Section 120.53(5) F.S.Where Request For Proposal specifications provided for three phases of bid evaluation; a protest filed after tabulation of only two phases was premature.
87-003188BID  GTE DATA SERVICES, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1987)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Nov. 19, 1987
1. Whether the proposals submitted by Consultec and EDS met the mandatory requirements of the Request for Proposals, and, if not, whether the proposal submitted by GTE met the mandatory requirements; (2) Whether the evaluation of the proposals by HRS was infected with substantial, material irregularities which resulted in an arbitrary scoring and evaluation process; (3) Whether GTE has standing to contest the award of the contract to Consultec; and (4) Whether GTE has waived any of the issues it has raised due to its failure to timely challenge the terms and conditions of the Request for Proposals.Failure to supply separate financial statements considered only minor irregularity and petitioner failed to prove its substantial interests will be affected.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer