welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Matthew B. Devisse
Matthew B. Devisse
Matthew B. Devisse
Visitors: 26
0
Bar #119125(FL)     License for 9 years; Member in Good Standing
Naples FL

Are you Matthew B. Devisse? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

18-2517  ANDREW MORGAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA  (2018)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 01, 2018
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ANDREW MORGAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D18-2517 [November 1, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.801 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 502016CF011708A, 502017CF003124A and 502016CF011832A. Andrew Morgan, Doral, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., conc..
  Gurney v. State  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: May 14, 1936 Citations: 124 Fla. 280, 168 So. 245
In this case Mr. Chief Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice DAVIS are of the opinion that the judgment of the Circuit Court should be reversed, while Mr. Presiding Justice ELLIS and Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the said judgment should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whethe..
  Stanton v. Harris  (1943)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Apr. 16, 1943 Citations: 13 So. 2d 17, 152 Fla. 736
Plaintiffs filed their bill of complaint seeking injunctive relief against the defendants. William W. Stanton, one of the defendants, filed his motion to dismiss on the ground that there was no equity in the bill. After argument, the trial court entered an order denying the motion to dismiss. The cause is now before us on petition for an interlocutory certiorari to review the order. From what we can gather from the bill of complaint, it seems that the plaintiffs, and at least 500 other persons wh..
81-002976  UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1981)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 31, 1983
Assuming a need for additional hospital beds in Broward County by 1987, the agreed "planning horizon," the question becomes which, if any, of the six or seven proposals advanced in these proceedings would be the best means of meeting the need. Central to the bed need issue in this case is the parties' enigmatic stipulation: 2/ that there is a need for acute care beds in Broward County in 1987, and this need should be determined on a regionalized basis. Pembroke Pines joins in this stipulation only to the extent that a need does not exist in the proposed service area of SBHD. Prehearing Stipulation C.8. The parties were unable to agree on where these regional boundaries should be drawn, among other things.Competing health care providers vie for Certificates of Need (CONs) in an already overbuilt county. Recommended Order: grant some CONs, but not all, based on projected need in Broward County.
81-002035  GATEWAY HOSPITAL CORPORATION, EAST vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1981)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Feb. 03, 1982
Intervenor's Certificate of Need (CON) for capital expenditures should be expedited because falls within noncompetition exception. Dismiss because there was no standing.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer