welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Michael B Axman
Michael B Axman
Michael B Axman
Visitors: 43
0
Bar #370800(FL)     License for 42 years
Miami FL

Are you Michael B Axman? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

No. 20581-98  DESERIO v. COMMISSIONER  (2001)
United States Tax Court Filed: Jun. 27, 2001
T.C. Memo. 2001-154 UNITED STATES TAX COURT LOU DESERIO, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 20581-98. Filed June 27, 2001. Lou Deserio, pro se. Erin K. Huss, for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION GERBER, Judge: Respondent filed two motions, one seeking dismissal for lack of prosecution and the other seeking damages against petitioner under section 6673(a)(1).1 We consider the 1 All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, in effect for the years in issu..
194  Beutler v. Grand Trunk Junction R. Co.  (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 18, 1912 Citations: 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2281, 224 U.S. 85, 32 S. Ct. 402, 56 L. Ed. 679
224 U.S. 85 (1912) BEUTLER v. GRAND TRUNK JUNCTION RAILWAY COMPANY. No. 194. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted March 6, 1912. Decided March 18, 1912. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. Mr. James J. Barbour, with whom Mr. Raymond W. Beach and Mr. Elmer E. Beach were on the brief for Beutler. Mr. George W. Kretzinger for Railway Company. *88 MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court. The deceased, Fetta, was at work in the repair yard of a rai..
98  Arnett v. Reade  (1911)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 03, 1911 Citations: 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1679, 220 U.S. 311, 31 S. Ct. 425, 55 L. Ed. 477
220 U.S. 311 (1911) ARNETT v. READE. No. 98. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 14, 1911. Decided April 3, 1911. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. Mr. N.C. Frenger and Mr. Clifford S. Walton for appellants. Mr. J.H. Paxton for appellee. *318 MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court. This is a suit to quiet title brought by the appellee against the widow of Adolpho Lea, for whom her heirs were substituted upon her decease. Adolpho Lea married in 1..

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer