Orange FL and Civil rights Lawyers | Michael Harrison Bowli -- eLawyers

Michael Harrison Bowling

Visitors: 49

Free initial consultation

Bar #333026(FL) License for 43 years

Orlando FL

Are you Michael Harrison Bowling? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Florida Laws: 120.569, 120.57, 120.68, 316.123, 509.092, 760.01, 760.02, 760.10, 760.11, 760.20, 760.23, 760.25, 760.34, 760.37, 768.28

Florida Administrative Code: 60Y-4.016

07-11196 Martin v. Brevard County Public Schools (2008)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Sep. 30, 2008

543 F.3d 1261 (2008) Anthony G. MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BREVARD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, an entity of the State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-11196. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. September 30, 2008. *1263 Daniel Arturo Perez, Bogin, Munns & Munns, Melbourne, FL, for Martin. Michael Harrison Bowling, Bell, Roper & Kohlmyer, P.A., Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellee. Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and KRAVITCH and ALARCÓN, [*] Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Anthony G..

08-10288 Houston v. Williams (2008)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Nov. 05, 2008 Citations: 547 F.3d 1357

547 F.3d 1357 (2008) Raymond HOUSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gay N. WILLIAMS, In her official capacity as Executive Director of the Brevard County Weatherization Program, Brevard County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-10288. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. November 5, 2008. *1359 Michael R. Masinter, Nova University Shepard Broad Law Ctr., Fort Lauderdale, FL, Randall C. Marshall, Am. Civ. Liberties Union of Florida, Inc., Miami, FL, Howard S. Marks, Graham, Builder, Jones, Pratt..

13-001972 RAY NELOMS vs CITY OF DELAND (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 23, 2013

Whether the Petitioner was subject to an unlawful employment practice by Respondent, the City of DeLand, on account of his race, or as retaliation for engaging in protected activities in violation of section 760.10, Florida Statutes.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent discriminated against him on the basis of his race, or retaliated against him for making a charge of discrimination.

12-002177 KURT G. MAHLER vs MARION COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 20, 2012

Whether the Marion County Board of County Commissioners (County or Respondent) discriminated against Kurt G. Mahler (Petitioner) on the basis of Petitioner's disability.Petitioner failed to prove his claim of discrimination based on disability.

12-000413 LEU FREYCINET vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 26, 2012

The issue is whether the Respondent committed an unlawful employment practice under section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2011), by discriminating against Petitioner on the basis of race, color, sex, or national origin, and if so, what remedy should be ordered.Petitioner failed to prove an unlawful employment practice of discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, or national origin under section 760.10, Florida Statutes.

10-010304 FANNIE BILLINGSLEY vs HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF WINTER PARK (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 19, 2010

Whether Petitioner showed by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent engaged in an unfair and discriminatory housing practice in violation of the Florida Fair Housing Act, section 760.20 et seq., Florida Statutes (2010).1/No violation of Florida Fair Housing Act where facts show Petitioner was not qualified to rent an apartment because she did not provide proof of employment.

09-000092 BETH THULIN vs CITY OF FLAGLER BEACH, FL (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 08, 2009

The issues are whether Petitioner committed an unlawful employment practice by discriminating against Petitioner based on her sex in violation of Section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2008), and by retaliating against her contrary to Section 760.10(7), Florida Statutes (2008).Petitioner did not prove that Respondent was responsible for sexual harrassment in the workplace and/or that Respondent retaliated against Petitioner for complaining about sexual harassment.