welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Michael Joseph Glazer
Michael Joseph Glazer
Michael Joseph Glazer
Visitors: 87
0
Bar #286508(FL)     License for 46 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Michael Joseph Glazer? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

18-002156BID  HTG VILLAGE VIEW, LLC vs MARQUIS PARTNERS, LTD., AND FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 30, 2018
Whether Respondent, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (“Florida Housing”), intended action to award housing credit funding to Marquis Partners, Ltd. (“Marquis Partners”), based on the Request for Applications 2017-113 Housing Credit Financing for Affordable Housing Developments Located in Broward, Duval, Hillsborough, Orange, Palm Beach, and Pinellas Counties (the “RFA”) is contrary to governing statutes, Florida Housing rules, or the RFA specifications; and, if so, whether the award is contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, or arbitrary and capricious.Petitioner proved that Respondent's scoring decision regarding Respondent's application was erroneous and that Respondent's application is ineligible for funding. Funding should be awarded to Petitioner.
16-000114CON  CGH HOSPITAL, LTD., D/B/A CORAL GABLES HOSPITAL; TENENT HIALEAH HEALTHSYSTEM, INC., D/B/A HIALEAH HOSPITAL; AND LIFEMARK HOSPITALS, INC., D/B/A PALMETTO GENERAL HOSPITAL vs THE PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, D/B/A JACKSON HOSPITAL WEST AND AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 12, 2016
Whether, on balance, Certificate of Need (“CON”) application number 10395 by The Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County, Florida (“JW”) to build a 100-bed acute care hospital in Miami- Dade County, Florida, AHCA District 11, and/or CON application number 10394 by East Florida-DMC, Inc. (“DMC”), to build an 80- bed acute care hospital in Miami-Dade County, Florida, satisfy the applicable criteria and should be approved.The evidence supported a need for a new hospital to be located in Doral, Miami-Dade County. On balance, East Florida-DMC better satisfied the applicable criteria and should be awarded CON 10394 to construct 80-bed hospital on its site in Doral.
16-000115CON  EAST FLORIDA-DMC, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 12, 2016
Whether, on balance, Certificate of Need (“CON”) application number 10395 by The Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County, Florida (“JW”) to build a 100-bed acute care hospital in Miami- Dade County, Florida, AHCA District 11, and/or CON application number 10394 by East Florida-DMC, Inc. (“DMC”), to build an 80- bed acute care hospital in Miami-Dade County, Florida, satisfy the applicable criteria and should be approved.The evidence supported a need for a new hospital to be located in Doral, Miami-Dade County. On balance, East Florida-DMC better satisfied the applicable criteria and should be awarded CON 10394 to construct 80-bed hospital on its site in Doral.
15-005556CON  THE HOSPICE OF THE FLORIDA SUNCOAST, INC., D/B/A SUNCOAST HOSPICE vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 05, 2015
The issue in this case is whether the application of Seasons Hospice & Palliative Care of Pinellas County, LLC (Seasons), for a certificate of need (CON) to establish a new hospice program in service area 5B (Pinellas County), should be approved or denied.Balance of review criteria weighs heavily in favor of issuing CON to Seasons for the second hospice in the large, elderly Pinellas service area. On the facts, competition will enhance quality and access to hospice services.
15-002003CON  SEASONS HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF TAMPA, LLC vs WEST FLORIDA HEALTH, INC., AND AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 13, 2015
Whether the Certificate of Need (“CON”) applications filed by Seasons Hospice and Palliative Care, Inc. (“Seasons”); Gulfside Hospice and Pasco Palliative Care, Inc. (“Gulfside”); and West Florida Health, Inc. (“West Florida”); for a new hospice program in Agency for Health Care Administration (“AHCA” or the “Agency”) Service Area 6A/Hillsborough County, satisfy the applicable statutory and rule review criteria sufficiently to warrant approval, and, if so, which of the three applications best meets the applicable criteria, on balance, for approval.On balance, Seasons best satisfied the criteria for approval of its Certificate of Need application in this comparative review.
15-002007CON  WEST FLORIDA HEALTH, INC. vs GULFSIDE HOSPICE AND PASCO PALLIATIVE CARE, INC.; SEASONS HOSPICE OF PALLIATIVE CARE OF TAMPA, LLC; VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF FLORIDA; AND LIFE PATH HOSPICE, INC.  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 13, 2015
Whether the Certificate of Need (“CON”) applications filed by Seasons Hospice and Palliative Care, Inc. (“Seasons”); Gulfside Hospice and Pasco Palliative Care, Inc. (“Gulfside”); and West Florida Health, Inc. (“West Florida”); for a new hospice program in Agency for Health Care Administration (“AHCA” or the “Agency”) Service Area 6A/Hillsborough County, satisfy the applicable statutory and rule review criteria sufficiently to warrant approval, and, if so, which of the three applications best meets the applicable criteria, on balance, for approval.On balance, Seasons best satisfied the criteria for approval of its Certificate of Need application in this comparative review.
15-007267  DANIEL BANKS vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPASSIONATE USE  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 18, 2015
The issue in this case is whether a nolo contendere plea by Petitioner, Daniel Banks, to possession of a controlled substance (phenobarbital) in the State of Kansas in 2004 is a disqualifying offense under section 435.04, Florida Statutes. (Unless specifically stated otherwise herein, all references to Florida Statutes shall be to the 2015 version.)Petitioner's crime committed in Kansas in 2004 was not a felony, thus it was not a disqualifying event.
15-003302BID  HOUSTON STREET MANOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 09, 2015
The issues in this bid protest are whether Respondent's preliminary decision to award low-income housing tax credits to Intervenor should be implemented, notwithstanding the fact that, unbeknownst to Respondent during the evaluation and scoring of the competing applications, Intervenor's application contained a material misrepresentation about a transit service, which Intervenor urges is a minor irregularity that can be waived; and, if the preliminary decision is set aside, whether Respondent should award the credits to Petitioner, who is next in line, but whose application, Intervenor alleges, contains material deviations from the specifications that render it nonresponsive.Intended award of tax credits to Intervenor should not be implemented because Intervenor's application contained a material misrepresentation, without which its application would not have been selected; recommended that award go to Petitioner.
14-002828BID  CENTURYLINK PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., D/B/A CENTURY LINK vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 18, 2014
Is Respondent, Department of Corrections' (Department), Notice of Intent to Award DC RFP-13-031 for Statewide Inmate Telecommunication Services to Intervenor, Global Tel*Link Corporation (Global), contrary to the governing statutes, rules, or policies or to the Department's Request for Proposal solicitation specifications?RFP did not require labeled subsections. Agency arbitrarily ranked responses not marked by subsection s omitted. Allowing 2 bidders to exclude commissions from blended rate when RFP said they must be included was arbitrary and capricious.
14-002894BID  SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 18, 2014
Is Respondent, Department of Corrections' (Department), Notice of Intent to Award DC RFP-13-031 for Statewide Inmate Telecommunication Services to Intervenor, Global Tel*Link Corporation (Global), contrary to the governing statutes, rules, or policies or to the Department's Request for Proposal solicitation specifications?RFP did not require labeled subsections. Agency arbitrarily ranked responses not marked by subsection s omitted. Allowing 2 bidders to exclude commissions from blended rate when RFP said they must be included was arbitrary and capricious.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer