welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Michael L Smith
Michael L Smith
Michael L Smith
Visitors: 75
0
Bar #144487(FL)     License for 27 years
Altamonte Springs FL

Are you Michael L Smith? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.536, 120.54, 120.542, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.68, 20.43, 215.36, 218.36, 456.013, 456.063, 456.072, 465.002, 465.007, 465.013, 468.306, 478.45, 57.104, 57.105, 627.428, 7.10, 7.40

Florida Administrative Code: 64B16-26.203, 64B16-26.2031, 64B16-26.2032, 64B16-26.400

5D17-2362  State v. Mark B. Snook  (2018)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 21, 2018
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D17-2362 MARK BRADLEY SNOOK, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed May 25, 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. James S. Purdy, Public De..
97-2269    (1998)
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Filed: Aug. 20, 1998 Citations: 154 F.3d 795
154 F.3d 795 159 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2001 , 135 Lab.Cas. P 10,223 Luke SCHUVER; Terry Porsch; Burl Moore, Appellants, v. MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY; William G. Stowe; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 499; William L. Wilson, Appellees. No. 97-2269. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 8, 1997. Decided Aug. 20, 1998. Robert Tiefenthaler, Sioux City, Iowa, argued, for Appellants. James R. Villone, Sioux City, Iowa, argued (Douglas L. Phillips, on the brief)..
77-1058  National Labor Relations Board v. Mr. Porto, Inc., D/B/A Custom Display Studios  (1978)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Filed: Dec. 29, 1978 Citations: 590 F.2d 637
590 F.2d 637 100 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2324 , 85 Lab.Cas. P 10,985 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. MR. PORTO, INC., d/b/a Custom Display Studios, Respondent. No. 77-1058. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued Dec. 6, 1978. Decided Dec. 29, 1978. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen Armstrong, Edmund D. Cooke, Jr., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Bernard Gottfried, Director Region 7, N. L. R. B., Detroit, Mich., Margery E. Lieber, Washington, D. C., for peti..
16-006488PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs SAMY F. BISHAI, M.D.  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 04, 2016
Whether Respondent violated section 456.072(1)(v), Florida Statutes (2012-2013), as alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed for his conduct.Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent committed sexual misconduct with four patients. Recommend revocation.
08-002728RX  VIPUL PATEL vs BOARD OF PHARMACY  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 09, 2008
The issues in this case are the amount of attorney’s fees and costs to be awarded to Petitioners pursuant to Section 120.595, Florida Statutes (2007);1 whether Petitioners are entitled to fees and costs pursuant to Subsections 57.105(5), 120.569(2)(e), and 120.595(4), Florida Statutes; and, if so, what amount should be awarded.Fourteen Petitioners, who filed separate rule challenges with identical issues, were not entitled to the statutory limit of fees for each petition. The fees were awarded as if one petition was filed.
08-002729RX  MIRIAM L. HERNANDEZ vs BOARD OF PHARMACY  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 10, 2008
The issues in this case are the amount of attorney’s fees and costs to be awarded to Petitioners pursuant to Section 120.595, Florida Statutes (2007);1 whether Petitioners are entitled to fees and costs pursuant to Subsections 57.105(5), 120.569(2)(e), and 120.595(4), Florida Statutes; and, if so, what amount should be awarded.Fourteen Petitioners, who filed separate rule challenges with identical issues, were not entitled to the statutory limit of fees for each petition. The fees were awarded as if one petition was filed.
08-002730RX  MIRLEY ALEMAN-ALEJO vs BOARD OF PHARMACY  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 10, 2008
The issues in this case are the amount of attorney’s fees and costs to be awarded to Petitioners pursuant to Section 120.595, Florida Statutes (2007);1 whether Petitioners are entitled to fees and costs pursuant to Subsections 57.105(5), 120.569(2)(e), and 120.595(4), Florida Statutes; and, if so, what amount should be awarded.Fourteen Petitioners, who filed separate rule challenges with identical issues, were not entitled to the statutory limit of fees for each petition. The fees were awarded as if one petition was filed.
08-002731RX  VALLIAMMAI NATARAJAN vs BOARD OF PHARMACY  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 10, 2008
The issues in this case are the amount of attorney’s fees and costs to be awarded to Petitioners pursuant to Section 120.595, Florida Statutes (2007);1 whether Petitioners are entitled to fees and costs pursuant to Subsections 57.105(5), 120.569(2)(e), and 120.595(4), Florida Statutes; and, if so, what amount should be awarded.Fourteen Petitioners, who filed separate rule challenges with identical issues, were not entitled to the statutory limit of fees for each petition. The fees were awarded as if one petition was filed.
08-002732RX  JOHN H. NEAMATALLA vs BOARD OF PHARMACY  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 10, 2008
The issues in this case are the amount of attorney’s fees and costs to be awarded to Petitioners pursuant to Section 120.595, Florida Statutes (2007);1 whether Petitioners are entitled to fees and costs pursuant to Subsections 57.105(5), 120.569(2)(e), and 120.595(4), Florida Statutes; and, if so, what amount should be awarded.Fourteen Petitioners, who filed separate rule challenges with identical issues, were not entitled to the statutory limit of fees for each petition. The fees were awarded as if one petition was filed.
08-002733RX  SAMAD MRIDHA vs BOARD OF PHARMACY  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 10, 2008
The issues in this case are the amount of attorney’s fees and costs to be awarded to Petitioners pursuant to Section 120.595, Florida Statutes (2007);1 whether Petitioners are entitled to fees and costs pursuant to Subsections 57.105(5), 120.569(2)(e), and 120.595(4), Florida Statutes; and, if so, what amount should be awarded.Fourteen Petitioners, who filed separate rule challenges with identical issues, were not entitled to the statutory limit of fees for each petition. The fees were awarded as if one petition was filed.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer