welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Michael Pasquale Sasso
Michael Pasquale Sasso
Michael Pasquale Sasso
Visitors: 53
1
Bar #167363(FL)     License for 26 years; Member in Good Standing
Palmetto FL

Are you Michael Pasquale Sasso? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

02-001097CON  UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND ST. JOSEPH`S HOSPITAL, INC.  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 19, 2002
The issue in this cause is whether University Community Hospital's Certificate of Need Application to establish a new, 5-bed Level III neonatal intensive care unit in District 6 should be approved or whether St. Joseph's Hospital's Certificate of Need Application for the addition of 5 Level III beds to its existing Level III neonatal intensive care program in District 6 should be approved.University Community Hospital demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that it was the appropriate facility to receive five Level III Neo-Natal Intensive Care Unit beds in District 6.
02-000456CON  ST. JOSEPH`S HOSPITAL, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC.  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 2002
The issue in this cause is whether University Community Hospital's Certificate of Need Application to establish a new, 5-bed Level III neonatal intensive care unit in District 6 should be approved or whether St. Joseph's Hospital's Certificate of Need Application for the addition of 5 Level III beds to its existing Level III neonatal intensive care program in District 6 should be approved.VCH demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that it was the appropriate facility to receive 5 Level III NICU beds in District 6.
02-000868  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs SUNBELT HEALTH CARE AND SUBACUTE CENTER  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 28, 2002
Whether Respondent violated Sections 400.022(1)(l) and 400.022(1)(o), Florida Statutes; Rule 59A-4.1288, Florida Administrative Code; and 42 C.F.R. Sections 483.13(b) and 483.13(c), and, if so, should Respondent be issued a conditional license, effective November 17, 2001.Agency failed to establish that facility failed to provide care and services to ensure that a resident was free from physical abuse by other residents.
01-004128  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC., D/B/A OAKVIEW REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 2001
Whether Respondent violated Sections 400.022(1)(l), 400.022(1)(o), and 400.147(4) and (7), Florida Statutes, and Rules 59A-4.1288, 59A-4.106(2), and 59A-4.108(4), Florida Administrative Code, for which a fine is authorized under Sections 400.22(3), 400.102, 400.121, 400.19(3), and 400.23(8)(a), and if so, what penalties should be imposed. (DOAH Case No. 01-4129); Whether a moratorium on admissions was appropriately ordered by Petitioner against Respondent on August 10, 2001, (DOAH Case No. 01-4128).First application of Section 400.23(8)(2001), effective May 15, 2001, provisions assigning class and scope of nursing home deficiencies. Single Class I is sufficient for moratorium. Agency selection of 400.23(8) for fine calculation will not be disturbed.
02-000448CON  ORLANDO REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 2002
Whether there is need for a new 60-bed general acute care hospital in Seminole County? If so, to which of two applicants should a CON be awarded to construct and operate the hospital: Orlando Regional Healthcare System, Inc. (CON 9496), or Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc., d/b/a Florida Hospital (CON 9497)?Not normal circumstances of mal-distribution of beds and access problems with emergency services demonstrate need. Florida Hospital`s application is superior to Orlando Regional`s.
02-000449CON  ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM/SUNBELT, INC., D/B/A FLORIDA HOSPITAL vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 2002
Whether there is need for a new 60-bed general acute care hospital in Seminole County? If so, to which of two applicants should a CON be awarded to construct and operate the hospital: Orlando Regional Healthcare System, Inc. (CON 9496), or Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc., d/b/a Florida Hospital (CON 9497)?Not normal circumstances of mal-distribution of beds and access problems with emergency services demonstrate need. Florida Hospital`s application is superior to Orlando Regional`s.
01-004054  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs HARBORSIDE HEALTHCARE OF PALM HARBOR  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 2001
Whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated August 23, 2001, and, if so the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove allegations in complaint by preponderance of the evidence; issuance of conditional license reversed.
01-004055  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs HARBORSIDE HEALTHCARE OF PALM HARBOR  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 2001
Whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated August 23, 2001, and, if so the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove allegations in complaint by preponderance of the evidence; issuance of conditional license reversed.
01-004129  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC., D/B/A OAKVIEW REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 2001
Whether Respondent violated Sections 400.022(1)(l), 400.022(1)(o), and 400.147(4) and (7), Florida Statutes, and Rules 59A-4.1288, 59A-4.106(2), and 59A-4.108(4), Florida Administrative Code, for which a fine is authorized under Sections 400.22(3), 400.102, 400.121, 400.19(3), and 400.23(8)(a), and if so, what penalties should be imposed. (DOAH Case No. 01-4129); Whether a moratorium on admissions was appropriately ordered by Petitioner against Respondent on August 10, 2001, (DOAH Case No. 01-4128).First application of Section 400.23(8)(2001), effective May 15, 2001, provisions assigning class and scope of nursing home deficiencies. Single Class I is sufficient for moratorium. Agency selection of 400.23(8) for fine calculation will not be disturbed.
01-002152  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs GOLFVIEW NURSING HOME  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 01, 2001
Whether Respondent violated Sections 400.102, 400.121, and 400.23, Florida Statutes, and Rule 59A-4.133(16)(d), Florida Administrative Code; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Hot water temperatures in resident rooms likely affected by adjustment to facility boiler during survey and by work being done during survey. No violation of Rule 59A-4.133, Florida Administrative Code.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer