welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Michael Patrick Donaldson
Michael Patrick Donaldson
Michael Patrick Donaldson
Visitors: 145
0
Bar #802761(FL)     License for 36 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Michael Patrick Donaldson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

21-000727BID  VISTA AT COCONUT PALM, LTD vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 23, 2021
Whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (“Florida Housing”) preliminary award of funding to University Station I, LLC (“University Station”), was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious, or contrary to Florida Housing’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or RFA specifications.Petitioner failed to carry its burden of demonstrating that Florida Housing's proposed award to University Station was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.
20-001766BID  BDG PARKWOOD LOFTS, LP vs CHRISTIAN MANOR RESTORATION, LLC, AND FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 09, 2020
The issues presented for determination are whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (FHFC) determinations regarding the applications responding to Request for Applications 2019-116 SAIL Financing of Affordable Multifamily Housing Development to Be Used In Conjunction With Tax-Exempt Bond Financing And Non-Competitive Housing Credits (the RFA), were clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious; and whether the award to Respondent Christian Manor Restoration, LLC (Christian Manor), is contrary to governing statutes, rules, or the solicitation specifications of the RFA.FHFC's determination of eligibility and intended award were consistent with statutes, rules, and the RFA, and not clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious. Any mistakes in geographic coordinates were minor irregularities.
20-001770BID  HTG ADDISON II, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 09, 2020
Whether Respondent, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s ("Florida Housing") intended action to award housing tax credit funding to Intervenors Westside Phase, I, LLLP ("Westside"), HTG Edgewood, Ltd. ("HTG Edgewood"), Diplomat South, LLC ("Diplomat"), and Tranquility at Milton, LLC ("Tranquility"), under Request for Applications 2019-113 Housing Credit Financing for Affordable Housing Developments Located in Medium and Small Counties (the "RFA"), is contrary to governing statutes, rules, the RFA specifications, and clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioners HTG Addison and Madison Oaks failed to prove that Florida Housing's determination of eligibility and intended award of tax credits were contrary to statutes, rules, the RFA, clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious.
20-001779BID  MADISON SQUARE, LLC AND ARC 2019, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 09, 2020
Whether Respondent, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s ("Florida Housing") intended action to award housing tax credit funding to Intervenors Westside Phase, I, LLLP ("Westside"), HTG Edgewood, Ltd. ("HTG Edgewood"), Diplomat South, LLC ("Diplomat"), and Tranquility at Milton, LLC ("Tranquility"), under Request for Applications 2019-113 Housing Credit Financing for Affordable Housing Developments Located in Medium and Small Counties (the "RFA"), is contrary to governing statutes, rules, the RFA specifications, and clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioners HTG Addison and Madison Oaks failed to prove that Florida Housing's determination of eligibility and intended award of tax credits were contrary to statutes, rules, the RFA, clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious.
20-001780BID  MADISON OAKS EAST, LLC, AND ARC 2019, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 09, 2020
Whether Respondent, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s ("Florida Housing") intended action to award housing tax credit funding to Intervenors Westside Phase, I, LLLP ("Westside"), HTG Edgewood, Ltd. ("HTG Edgewood"), Diplomat South, LLC ("Diplomat"), and Tranquility at Milton, LLC ("Tranquility"), under Request for Applications 2019-113 Housing Credit Financing for Affordable Housing Developments Located in Medium and Small Counties (the "RFA"), is contrary to governing statutes, rules, the RFA specifications, and clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioners HTG Addison and Madison Oaks failed to prove that Florida Housing's determination of eligibility and intended award of tax credits were contrary to statutes, rules, the RFA, clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious.
20-003094BID  QUAIL ROOST TRANSIT VILLAGE I, LTD. vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 13, 2020
The issues are whether the actions of Florida Housing concerning the review and scoring of the responses to Request for Applications 2020-208 (“RFA”), titled “SAIL and Housing Credit Financing for the Construction of Workforce Housing,” were contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications and, if so, whether the challenged award was contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, or arbitrary and/or capricious.Petitioner proved that Intervenor's application was ineligible for funding due to failure to disclose all principals and failure to provide accurate coordinates for scattered sites.
20-003582BID  LA ESTANCIA, LTD vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 13, 2020
The issue is whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (“Florida Housing”) review and scoring of the applications responding to RFA 2020-104 SAIL Funding for Farm Worker and Commercial Fishing Worker Housing (“the RFA”) were clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.The greater weight of the evidence indicates that Florida Housing’s review and scoring of the applications responding to the RFA were not clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.
21-000515BID  FLETCHER BLACK II, LLC, MADISON GROVE, LLC AND ARC 2020, LLC AND NEW SOUTH RESIDENTIAL, LLC, vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2021
The issues to be determined are whether, with respect to each application filed, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (Florida Housing) review and decision-making process in response to the Request for Applications 2020-201 (RFA) was contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, the agency’s rules or policies, or the RFA.Florida Housing's determination that two applicants demonstrated committed funding from the same jurisdiction was clearly erroneous; determination that errors in another application were a minor waivable irregularity was supported by evidence.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer