welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Michael Patrick Donaldson
Michael Patrick Donaldson
Michael Patrick Donaldson
Visitors: 30
0
Bar #802761(FL)     License for 35 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Michael Patrick Donaldson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

20-000140BID  BERKELEY LANDING, LTD., AND BERKELEY LANDING DEVELOPER, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
The issue is whether the actions of Florida Housing concerning the review and scoring of the responses to Request for Applications 2019-102 (“RFA”), titled “Community Development Block Grant--Disaster Recovery (‘CDBG- DR’) to be Used in Conjunction with Tax-Exempt MMRB and Non- Competitive Housing Credits in Counties Deemed Hurricane Recovery Priorities,” were contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications.Resolution of five consolidated protests involving seven RFA applicants and various issues.
20-000141BID  BRISAS DEL ESTE APARTMENTS, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
The issue is whether the actions of Florida Housing concerning the review and scoring of the responses to Request for Applications 2019-102 (“RFA”), titled “Community Development Block Grant--Disaster Recovery (‘CDBG- DR’) to be Used in Conjunction with Tax-Exempt MMRB and Non- Competitive Housing Credits in Counties Deemed Hurricane Recovery Priorities,” were contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications.Resolution of five consolidated protests involving seven RFA applicants and various issues.
20-000145BID  HTG BELLA VISTA, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
The issue is whether the actions of Florida Housing concerning the review and scoring of the responses to Request for Applications 2019-102 (“RFA”), titled “Community Development Block Grant--Disaster Recovery (‘CDBG- DR’) to be Used in Conjunction with Tax-Exempt MMRB and Non- Competitive Housing Credits in Counties Deemed Hurricane Recovery Priorities,” were contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications.Resolution of five consolidated protests involving seven RFA applicants and various issues.
20-001141BID  PARC GROVE, LLC vs NARANJA LAKES HOUSING PARTNERS, LP, HARBOUR SPRINGS, LLC, AND FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 02, 2020
Whether the Petitions filed by Ambar Trail, Ltd.; Sierra Meadows Apartments, Ltd.; and Quail Roost Transit Village IV, Ltd., should be dismissed for lack of standing.Petitioner failed to demonstrate that they could receive funding under any scenario or that the process was otherwise fundamentally unfair; therefore, recommended dismissal for lack of standing.
19-001261BID  AMBAR RIVERVIEW, LTD. vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 11, 2019
Whether Respondent, Florida Housing Finance Corporation's ("Florida Housing"), intended action to award housing tax credit funding to Intervenor, Las Brisas Trace, LP ("Las Brisas"), under Request for Applications 2018-111 Housing Credit Financing for Affordable Housing Developments Located in Miami-Dade County (the "RFA"), is contrary to governing statutes, rules, the RFA specifications, and clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioner failed to prove that Florida Housing's determination of eligibility and its intended award of tax credits were contrary to statutes, rules, the RFA, clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious.
18-000485BID  LIBERTY SQUARE PHASE TWO, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 29, 2018
The issue to be determined in this bid protest matter is whether Respondent, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s, intended award of funding under Request for Applications 2017- 108, entitled “SAIL Financing of Affordable Multifamily Housing Developments To Be Used In Conjunction With Tax-Exempt Bond Financing And Non-Competitive Housing Credits” was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioner failed to prove that Florida Housing's intended award of funding to Intervenor was erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious. Florida Housing was authorized to waive an error as a "Minor Irregularity."
18-002027BID  FOUR6 SKYWAY, LLC, AND DDA DEVELOPMENT, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION AND EAGLE RIDGE APARTMENTS, LLLP  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 18, 2018
The issue to determine in this bid protest matter is whether Respondent, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s, intended award of funding under Request for Applications 2017-113 was contrary to its governing statutes, rules, or the solicitation specifications.Petitioner failed to prove that Florida Housing's intended award of funding was contrary to its governing statutes, rules, or the solicitation specifications; or, that Florida Housing should have waived Petitioner's error as a "minor irregularity."
18-002130BID  HTG HERON ESTATES FAMILY, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 26, 2018
The issues presented for determination are whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s determination that the three applicant-parties were eligible for the allocation of low-income housing tax credits; and its intended decision to award such tax credits to Ocean Breeze East Apartments, LLC, are contrary to governing statutes, rules, or the solicitation specifications.1/Petitioners failed to prove that Florida Housing's determinations of eligibility and its intended award of tax credits were clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious.
18-002132BID  CHANNEL SIDE APARTMENTS, LTD vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 26, 2018
The issues presented for determination are whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s determination that the three applicant-parties were eligible for the allocation of low-income housing tax credits; and its intended decision to award such tax credits to Ocean Breeze East Apartments, LLC, are contrary to governing statutes, rules, or the solicitation specifications.1/Petitioners failed to prove that Florida Housing's determinations of eligibility and its intended award of tax credits were clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious.
18-003806BID  RENAISSANCE POINTE APARTMENTS, LLC vs MIDTOWN LOFTS, LTD., AND FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 18, 2018
The issue is whether the decision of Respondent Florida Housing Finance Corporation (FHFC) to waive, as a minor irregularity, the failure of Respondent Midtown Lofts, LTD. (Midtown) to disclose in its application for federal low-income housing tax credits (LIHTC) the existence of two occupied dwelling units on the property proposed for development is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious (Clearly Erroneous), as provided by section 120.57(3)(f), Florida Statutes.Not clearly erroneous for agency to treat discrepancy as a minor irregularity because it did not confer competitive advantage on applicant.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer