Leon FL Administrative law and Appeals Lawyers | Mohammad Om -- eLawyers

Mohammad Omar Jazil

Visitors: 46

850-222-7500

Bar #72556(FL) License for 16 years

Tallahassee FL

Are you Mohammad Omar Jazil? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

SC14-987 League of Women Voters v. Data Targeting, Inc. (2014)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: May 27, 2014

Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC14-987 _ THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA, et al., Petitioners, vs. DATA TARGETING, INC., et al., Respondents. [May 27, 2014] PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court on an emergency petition for the issuance of a constitutional writ, filed by the League of Women Voters of Florida, Common Cause, and eleven individually named parties, who are all plaintiffs in an ongoing lawsuit challenging the constitutional validity of the 2012 plan apportioning Florida’s c..

17-001449 THE SIESTA KEY ASSOCIATION OF SARASOTA, INC., AND MICHAEL S. HOLDERNESS vs CITY OF SARASOTA; U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 2017

The issue to be determined in these consolidated cases is whether the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) and the City of Sarasota (“City”) (sometimes referred to as “the Applicants”) are entitled to the proposed joint coastal permit, public easement, and sovereign submerged lands use authorization (referred to collectively as “the Permit”) from the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) and the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund to dredge sand from Big Sarasota Pass and its ebb shoal and place the sand on the shoreline of Lido Key.It is recommended that the joint coastal permit be approved, but only if it is modified to restrict dredging during the spawning season for the spotted seatrout; otherwise it is recommended that the permit be denied.

12-002811 FLORIDA AUDUBON SOCIETY vs SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA, UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, SUGAR FARMS CO-OP, AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 17, 2012

The issue to be determined in this case is whether Respondents, United States Sugar Corporation (“USSC”), Sugar Farms Co-op (“SFC”), and Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida (“SCGC”) (collectively “the Applicants”) are entitled to the Everglades Works of the District permits (“WOD Permits”), issued to them by the South Florida Water Management District (“District”).Petitioner failed to prove that the Applicants are not entitled to the Works of the District permits in the Everglades Agricultural Area.

Mohammad Omar Jazil

SC14-987 League of Women Voters v. Data Targeting, Inc. (2014)

17-001449 THE SIESTA KEY ASSOCIATION OF SARASOTA, INC., AND MICHAEL S. HOLDERNESS vs CITY OF SARASOTA; U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND (2017)

12-002811 FLORIDA AUDUBON SOCIETY vs SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA, UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, SUGAR FARMS CO-OP, AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (2012)

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Search for lawyers by practice areas.