Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Latest Update: May 15, 1989
The basic issue in this case is whether the Petitioner is entitled to a variance from some of the requirements of Rule 10D-5.097, Florida Administrative Code, regarding public swimming pools. At the hearing, both parties presented the testimony of witnesses and offered exhibits. Following the hearing a transcript was filed on March 3, 1989, and the parties were allowed until March 23, 1989, within which to file their proposed recommended orders. Both parties filed proposed recommended orders containing proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. All proposed findings of fact submitted by all parties are specifically addressed in the appendix to this recommended order.Petitioner not entitled to variance from require that pool have ""slip resistant"" surface but is entitled to variance from require that pool color be white or light pastel.
