Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Noah Scott Warman
Noah Scott Warman
Visitors: 27
0
Bar #30960(FL)     License for 30 years
Coral Gables FL

Are you Noah Scott Warman? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

  Canady v. State  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Feb. 07, 1936 Citations: 122 Fla. 781, 165 So. 924
The evidence in this case is of such a nature that in the opinion of the Court the administration of the law will be best subserved by granting a new trial herein. Reversed. WHITFIELD, C.J., and BROWN and DAVIS, J.J., concur. ELLIS, P.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
  State, Ex Rel. Walsh v. Sweat  (1937)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 1937 Citations: 130 Fla. 872
Writ of Error dismissed on Motion of Counsel for Plaintiff in Error.
3D10-2435  ATLANTIC CIVIL, INC. v. South Florida Water Management Dist.  (2011)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Sep. 28, 2011 Citations: 77 So. 3d 1268
77 So. 3d 1268 (2011) ATLANTIC CIVIL, INC. v. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DIST. No. 3D10-2435. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. September 28, 2011. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.
4D11-621  RLJ v. State  (2012)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 29, 2012 Citations: 83 So. 3d 738
83 So. 3d 738 (2012) R.L.J. v. STATE. No. 4D11-621. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. February 29, 2012. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.
19-12706  Yaimara Ricardo  (1988)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Dec. 29, 1988 Citations: 94 B.R. 779
94 B.R. 779 (1988) In re Ludwig KAISER and Erica Kaiser, Debtors. Milton G. FRIEDMAN, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Ludwig KAISER and Erica Kaiser, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 88-02187-BKC-SMW, Adv. No. 88-0478-BKC-SMW-A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. December 29, 1988. *780 Arthur C. Neiwirth, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for trustee. Milton G. Friedman, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., trustee. Howard P. Alterman, Pompano Beach, Fla., for debtors. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SIDNEY M. WEAVE..
11-10594  Mulhall v. UNITE HERE LOCAL 355  (2012)
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Jan. 18, 2012 Citations: 667 F.3d 1211
667 F.3d 1211 (2012) Martin MULHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITE HERE LOCAL 355, Hollywood Greyhound Track, Inc., doing business as Mardi Gras Gaming, Defendants-Appellees. No. 11-10594. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. January 18, 2012. *1212 William L. Messenger, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Springfield, VA, Daniel R. Levine, Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Gora, PA, Boca Raton, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Noah Scott Warman, Sugarman & Susskind, PA, Coral Gab..
09-12683  Mulhall v. Unite Here Local 355  (2010)
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Sep. 10, 2010
618 F.3d 1279 (2010) Martin MULHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITE HERE LOCAL 355, Hollywood Greyhound Track, Inc., d.b.a. Mardi Gras Gaming, Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-12683. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. September 10, 2010. *1283 William L. Messenger, Nat. Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Springfield, VA, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Noah Scott Warman, Sugarman & Susskind, P.A., Miami, FL, Robert L. Norton, Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A., Miami, FL, Brianne Marie Strohsahl,..
92-738  Smith v. State  (1993)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 12, 1993 Citations: 614 So. 2d 525
614 So. 2d 525 (1993) Aurelian SMITH, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 92-738. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. January 8, 1993. On Motion for Rehearing March 12, 1993. Horace Smith, Jr., of Monaco, Smith, Hood, Perkins, Loucks & Stout, Daytona Beach, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robin Compton Jones, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The defendant was originally charged with the felony of aggravat..
94-002005  DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs EDWARD E. SMITH  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 13, 1994
The issue for determination is whether Petitioner's suspension/termination of Respondent is proper.Even though respondent engaged in limited transgressions, totality of circumstances do not show that they rise to level or gravamen for suspension/dismissal.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer