welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Pamela Sue Leslie
Pamela Sue Leslie
Pamela Sue Leslie
Visitors: 55
0
Bar #372560(FL)     License for 41 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Pamela Sue Leslie? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 33 U.S.c 408, 42 U.S.C 2011

CFR: 14 CFR 77, 33 CFR 208, 33 CFR 385, 33 CFR 385.20, 33 CFR 385.20, 33 CFR 385.20, 33 CFR 385.26, 33 CFR 385.26, 33 CFR 385.26, 40 CFR 144.39, 40 CFR 144.39, 40 CFR 144.39, 40 CFR 144.40, 40 CFR 144.40, 40 CFR 144.40, 40 CFR 144.41

Florida Laws: 10.15, 120.52, 120.57, 120.68, 120.69, 163.3164, 163.3194, 163.3209, 252.34, 253.02, 253.115, 258.397, 267.061, 334.03, 334.044, 335.182, 335.188, 337.401, 337.402, 337.403, 337.404, 361.01, 366.03, 366.04, 366.93, 373.016, 373.044, 373.085, 373.086, 373.089, 373.103, 373.113, 373.1391, 373.1501, 373.1502, 373.223, 373.229, 373.308, 373.309, 373.316, 373.413, 373.4135, 373.4136, 373.414, 373.416, 373.429, 373.4592, 373.603, 376.301, 379.2291, 379.2431, 380.04, 403.031, 403.061, 403.501, 403.502, 403.503, 403.504, 403.5064, 403.5065, 403.50665, 403.507, 403.508, 403.509, 403.510, 403.511, 403.5113, 403.5115, 403.514, 403.516, 403.519, 403.522, 403.526, 403.5271, 403.531, 403.5317, 48.20, 48.21, 7.01, 7.02, 713.01, 872.02

Florida Administrative Code: 18-18.004, 18-18.006, 18-21.003, 25-6.0342, 25-6.0345, 28-106.217, 40E-2.091, 40E-20.302, 40E-3.101, 40E-4.091, 40E-4.302, 40E-6.011, 40E-6.041, 40E-6.221, 40E-6.311, 40E-6.351, 62-110.106, 62-17.133, 62-17.191, 62-17.211, 62-17.281, 62-17.660, 62-345.100, 62-345.400, 62-345.500, 62-345.900, 62-555.310, 62-672.870, 68A-16.001, 68A-16.002

91-002249  MARINA PARK ASSOCIATES vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 09, 1991
The issue in this case is whether Petitioner's application to install a canopy over a sidewalk abutting State Road 5, U.S. 1, Biscayne Boulevard in Dade County, Florida should be granted.Petitioner not entitled to permit for canopy that would require supports on the sidewalk and would not provide 9ft clearance; no grounds for exemption.
89-004100  FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES vs DONALD L. HILGEMAN AND MARILYN HILGEMAN, D/B/A DLH ENTERPRISES, AND PAT MONTGOMERY, AS PARK OWNERS OF LAKE WALDENA RESORT  (1989)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 31, 1989
The is sues concern allegations set forth in a notice to show cause/administrative complaint by which Petitioner has accused Respondents of violation of Section 723.037(3), Florida Statutes, and Rule 7D-32.004(1), Florida Administrative Code, in that they are said to have refused to meet with the designated homeowners' committee within 30 days of giving notice of a lot rental increase after having been requested to do so. The purpose of that meeting would have been to discuss the reasons for the increase in lot rental.Held that respondent did not act inappropriately in the employed to increase lot rentals in mobile home park.
89-006598RX  DONALD L. HILGEMAN, D/B/A DLH ENTERPRISES, LAKE WALDENA RESORT vs DIVISION OF LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES  (1989)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 27, 1989
The issues for consideration in this case concern the petition and challenge to the validity of Rule 7D-32.001(4); Rule 7D-32.003 and Rules 7D- 32.004(1) and (2), Florida Administrative Code. The basis for the challenge is premised upon an alleged vagueness, inadequacy in the establishment of standards for agency decisions, the vesting of unbridled discretion in the agency and the contention that the rules are arbitrary and capricious.Preamble to Rules held invalid as they enlarge 723.037(3)FS. Rule 7D-32.001 (4),7D-3.32.004(1) and balance of 7D-32.003 upheld.
89-006776RX  WATER OAK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, AS GENERAL PARTNER OF WATER OAK, LTD. vs FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES  (1989)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 08, 1989
Whether Rule 7D-31.001(5), Florida Administrative Code, constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority? Whether a petition to determine the invalidity of a rule is properly addressed either to alleged, "unwritten, unadopted rule[s]," or to an agency's free form actions in a particular case?Policy implicit in agency action does not ipso facto amount to an administrative rule, even when it has been consistently applied.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer