Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Paul A Rowell
Paul A Rowell
Visitors: 60
0
Bar #220892(FL)     License for 48 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Paul A Rowell? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

  Ago  (1975)
Florida Attorney General Reports Filed: Feb. 11, 1975
QUESTION: May a mosquito control district located entirely within one county and created under the general laws of the state be abolished by the adoption of an ordinance by the board of county commissioners, which would also create by ordinance under home rule, a special service district which would be administered by the county board SUMMARY: Under Ch. 74-192, Laws of Florida, the dissolution of a special district created pursuant to general or special law may be effected only by a special act ..
2D09-1511, 2D09-1512  Carillo v. State  (2010)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 21, 2010 Citations: 37 So. 3d 857
37 So. 3d 857 (2010) CARILLO v. STATE. Nos. 2D09-1511, 2D09-1512. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 21, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.
4D99-4057, 4D00-311  Weiser v. Weiser  (2001)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 18, 2001
782 So. 2d 986 (2001) Sandy M. WEISER, Appellant, v. Joan P. WEISER, Appellee. Nos. 4D99-4057, 4D00-311. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. April 18, 2001. Patrick M. O'Hara of Patrick M. O'Hara, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant. Matthew S. Nugent of Law Office of Matthew S. Nugent, West Palm Beach, for appellee. ON MOTION FOR REHEARING LENDERMAN, JOHN C., Associate Judge. We grant appellee's motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion, and substitute the following: Th..
13-001622  DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES vs OAK GROVE CHURCH DAYCARE  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 01, 2013
The issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent committed the violations as alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what is the appropriate penalty.Respondent failed to have at least one staff member present with a current and valid certificate in infant/child CPR and first aid training. Recommend $100 fine.
83-000369  ALFA ROMEO, INC., AND PRESTIGE MOTORCAR IMPORTS vs. MILANO IMPORTED MOTORS, INC., ET AL.  (1983)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 22, 1990
The issue posed for decision herein is whether or not the licensee manufacturer, Alfa Romeo, Inc., has established that the existing dealers are failing to provide adequate representation in the community or territory. Introduction and Background Information This matter involves the application of Prestige Motorcar Imports, Inc. for an Alfa Romeo franchise in Dade County, Florida. The licensee stipulated that any alleged non-compliance with the franchise agreement would not be a basis herein for granting this license application filed on behalf of Prestige Motorcar Imports, Inc. Alfa Romeo is a motor vehicle manufactured in Italy. Alfa Romeo, Inc. (ARI herein) presently produces annually two hundred thousand (200,000) cars with the capability of producing up to three hundred thousand (300,000) cars annually. During 1981,ARI had three (3) dealers in the Dade-Broward "community or territory," one of which was located in the North Miami area, i.e., (L.P. Evans) at 9696 NW 7 Avenue, Miami, Florida. Evans voluntarily terminated its franchise with ARI in February of 1982 and ARI has had only two (2) dealers in the Dade- Broward market since that time. Milano is located in the southern part of Dade County, Florida. ARI now proposes to replace Evans in the North Miami area of responsibility (AOR) with Prestige Motorcar Imports, Inc. (Prestige herein).Petitioner entitled to Alfa dealership because the cars are not adequately represented by the existing scheme.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer