welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Philip Norman Bennett
Philip Norman Bennett
Philip Norman Bennett
Visitors: 51
0
Bar #85725(FL)     License for 15 years
Fort Lauderdale FL

Are you Philip Norman Bennett? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

78-000643  PETERSON OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CORPORATION vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1978)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Feb. 21, 1979
Whether the sign of Petitioner should be removed for violation of Section 479.11(7) and Rule 14-10.07(2)(e), maintaining a sign in an unsafe, insecure or unsightly condition and without face or topic for over twelve months.Petitioner's sign was unsightly by statute for having no copy for three years. Respondent didn't notify of violation and accepted renewal. Dismiss.
78-000659  GARY AND MAXINE DOTSON vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1978)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Oct. 10, 1978
Whether the sign of Petitioner should be removed for having been erected without a permit from the Respondent, the Department of Transportation.Petitioner claims sign is only way people can find business and that bigger companies were notified of need to permit first. Recommend removal of sign.
78-000644  RALPH KAZARIAN ADVERTISING AGENCY vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1978)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Sep. 28, 1978
Whether the signs of the Petitioner should be removed for violations of Section 479.07(2) and 14-10.04(2), no current permit and the violation of Section 479.07(2) and 14-10.06(3), a spacing violation.Unpermitted signs in violation of spacing requirements should be removed unless a permit can be secured.
78-000697  KENNETH E. GROSS AND HIGHLAND COURT vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1978)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Sep. 07, 1978
Whether the outdoor advertising sign of Petitioner should be removed.Respondent's sign was denied permit and Respondent erected it anyway. Recommend removal of sign.
77-000829  BERNARD CANNING vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1977)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Sep. 19, 1977
By Appeal filed March 29, 1977 Bernard J. Canning, Petitioner, appeals the three-day suspension from duty without pay awarded to him March 16, 1977 for disobedience of an order. Three witnesses were called by Respondent, Petitioner testified in his own behalf, and three exhibits were offered into evidence. The objection to Exhibit 2 on the grounds it was irrelevant was sustained. Exhibits 1 and 3 were admitted.Petitioner refused to deliver memo when ordered to do so by supervisor. He was suspended three days without pay. Recommend upholding penalty.
77-000012  JAMES BUCHANON vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1977)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 17, 1977
Petitioner is not eligible for any more relocation benefits.
76-001105  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. RICH OIL COMPANY  (1976)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Apr. 06, 1977
Whether the Respondent erected and maintained outdoor advertising signs without a proper permit and in violation of the set-back laws of Chapter 479, Florida Statutes.Respondent erected two signs without permits in rural areas. Recommend removal of sign.
76-000678  VELTIE A. DODSON vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1976)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Mar. 09, 1977
Petitioner entitled to relocation expense to cover rent on new lot and the economic rent of new versus Petitioner's old lot for four years.
76-000949  CITY OF ROCKLEDGE AND FLORIDA EAST COAST LINE RAILROAD vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1976)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Feb. 11, 1977
Whether a railroad crossing located at Florida East Coast Line Railroad Mile Post 175.49 should be closed.Grant railroad crossing closing subject to opening of new crossing nearby.
76-000028  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. U. S. SUGAR CORPORATION  (1976)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Feb. 11, 1977
Petitioner's request for railroad crossing should be granted on provision of adequate safety equipment.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer