Miami-Dade FL Litigation and Real estate Lawyers | Rafael A. -- eLawyers

97-002806 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs A DOCTOR`S OFFICE FOR WOMEN NORTH, INC., D/B/A A DOCTOR`S OFFICE FOR WOMEN NORTH, INC. (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 12, 1997

Whether Respondent failed to timely file its application for the renewal of its abortion clinic license, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint. If so, may the Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency) fine Respondent for failing to timely file its renewal application. If the Agency is authorized to impose such a fine, should it exercise such authority. If so, what is the amount of the fine it should impose.Agency for Health Care Administration is without authority to impose a fine for the late filing of an application to renew an abortion clinic license.

97-002807 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs A DOCTOR`S OFFICE FOR WOMEN NORTH, INC., D/B/A A DOCTOR`S OFFICE FOR WOMEN NORTH, INC. (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 12, 1997

Whether Respondent failed to timely file its application for the renewal of its abortion clinic license, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint. If so, may the Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency) fine Respondent for failing to timely file its renewal application. If the Agency is authorized to impose such a fine, should it exercise such authority. If so, what is the amount of the fine it should impose.Agency for Health Care Administration is without authority to impose a fine for the late filing of an application to renew an abortion clinic license.

93-001631F VLADIMIR ROSENTHAL vs BOARD OF MEDICINE (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 29, 1993

This is a proceeding pursuant to the Florida Equal Access To Justice Act, Section 57.111, Florida Statutes, in which the only disputed issue is whether the agency was substantially justified in the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against the Petitioner, a licensed physician, in DOAH Case No. 91- 2815, DPR Case No. 89-10153.Where agency action to initiate disciplinary proceedings was substantially justified, Petitioner is not entitled to award of attorney fees under 57.111

Rafael A. Perez-Pineiro

97-002806 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs A DOCTOR`S OFFICE FOR WOMEN NORTH, INC., D/B/A A DOCTOR`S OFFICE FOR WOMEN NORTH, INC. (1997)

97-002807 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs A DOCTOR`S OFFICE FOR WOMEN NORTH, INC., D/B/A A DOCTOR`S OFFICE FOR WOMEN NORTH, INC. (1997)

93-001631F VLADIMIR ROSENTHAL vs BOARD OF MEDICINE (1993)

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Search for lawyers by practice areas.