Leon FL Lawyers | Reba Elizabeth Atchison -- eLawyers

97-003500 PABLO R. VALERIO vs BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 30, 1997

Whether Petitioner is entitled to additional credit for his responses to the "Principles and Practice" portion of the electrical engineer examination administered by Respondent in October 1996.Licensure exam, including question not specifically challenged, was properly re-graded.

97-000902 JEFFREY JAMES TARR vs BOARD OF GEOLOGISTS (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 27, 1997

The issue in this case is whether Petitioner is entitled to credit for answers to two questions on the geology examination Petitioner took in August 1996.Respondent did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in denying credit for answers selected by Petitioner on geology exam.

97-003466 KIMBERLY LANG vs BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 28, 1997

The issue for consideration in this case is whether Petitioner should be given credit for all or any of her answers to the questions challenged from the November 20, 1996, Cosmetology Written Clinical Examination.Applicant entitled to credit for two additional questions on November 1996 cosmetology exam.

97-000932 ALVA LEE GRAHAM vs CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 27, 1997

Whether Petitioner's challenge to the failing grades he received on the Business and Financial Management and General Trade Knowledge portions of the April 1996 plumbing contractor certification examination should be sustained.Applicant's challenges to the grading of certain questions and problems on plumbing contracting certification examination were without merit.

97-001863 GARY COOK vs BARBER`S BOARD (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 15, 1997

The issue in this case is whether Petitioner, Gary Cook, should have received a passing score on the Barber Practical Examination taken by him in November 1996.Petitioner failed to prove he earned a passing score on barber examination.

95-004784F COURTYARD CENTER, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 27, 1995

Whether the Petitioner, Courtyard Center, Inc., was a prevailing small business party in Case Number 95-1970BID as defined by Section 57.111(3)(d)G, Florida Statutes, and, if so, whether the actions of the Department were substantially justified and whether special circumstances exist which would make the award unjust.Petitioner denied attorney's fees because petitioner rented property offered to 3rd party while bid protest was under way. Conduct made award unjust.

96-003774BID INFORMATION SYSTEMS OF FLORIDA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 13, 1996

Did Respondent act arbitrarily, fraudulently, illegally, or dishonestly in its decision related to RFP 96-006 when it deemed the proposal submitted by the Intervenor to be responsive to the RFP and determined that the Intervenor should be awarded a contract for software development and consultant services in association with the RFP?The agency failed to require vendor to submit names of subcontractors. This caused the response to be materially deficient.

96-000481 VASANTRO SHERE vs BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 26, 1996

The issue for determination is whether Petitioner's examination challenge should be sustained.Candidate for architect's exam failed to show questions were arbitrary or capricious and failed to show that he should receive credit for pre-test questions.

95-000903BID WILLIAM L. ROSS, JR. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 1996

The Petitioner challenged the Respondent's award of lease no. 700:0717 and was required to show that the agency's decision was fraudulent, arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law.Bid protestor did not prove agency's rejection of his response, which was the only proposal, was arbitrary and capricious.

95-001839BID WHARTON LITTLE RIVER INVESTMENT, INC., BY PROCACCI COMMERCIAL REALTY, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 14, 1995

Whether the Department of Corrections' proposed award of Lease No. 700:0710 to Melstine Corporation was proper.Bidder's proposed lease location met zoning requerements and was resonsive to Responsive Formal Proposal (RFP).

Reba Elizabeth Atchison