This is a proceeding in mandamus brought by the City of Pensacola against Escambia County. The alternative writ commands the County to account for and remit to the City one-half of all tax collections for 1933, arising from a special tax on property located within the corporate limits of the City, by virtue of Section 1604, Revised General Statutes of 1920, Section 2435, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and to forthwith draw its warrant in favor of the City for the sum of $4,451.19 to apply on acco..
This is a case of original jurisdiction. The petitioner for a writ of prohibition shows that the State Board of Medical Examiners of Florida served notice on the plaintiff that they would proceed to hear charges filed against him for the revocation of his license to practice medicine in the State of Florida. The basis for the proposed revocation is that the plaintiff was convicted of a *Page 295 felony on April 5, 1935, in the District Court of the United States in and for the Western District of..
This is a case of original jurisdiction. The petitioner for a writ of prohibition shows that the State Board of Medical Examiners of Florida served notice on the plaintiff that they would proceed to hear charges filed against him for the revocation of his license to practice medicine in the State of Florida. The basis for the proposed revocation is that the plaintiff was convicted of a *Page 295 felony on April 5, 1935, in the District Court of the United States in and for the Western District of..
In this case the judgment in habeas corpus which denied the plaintiff in error bail on a charge of murder in the first degree predicated on a commitment by a justice of the peace holding petitioner to await the action of the Grand Jury on such charge, must be reversed on the authority of Deeb v. Gandy, Sheriff, 110 Fla. 283 , 148 Sou. Rep. 540, this Court being of the opinion that under the evidence shown in this case, the proof was not so evident, nor the presumption so great, that the plaintiff..
We have before us application for certiorari to review interlocutory orders in a Chancery cause under our Rule 34. The original suit was by Bill of Complaint to foreclose an alleged contractor's lien for the balance due for the construction of a building. Sub-contractors intervened and sought affirmative relief claiming to be entitled to liens as direct contractors with the owner alleging that the plaintiff contractor was the agent of the owner and acted for the owner and not as an independent co..
We have before us application for certiorari to review interlocutory orders in a Chancery cause under our Rule 34. The original suit was by Bill of Complaint to foreclose an alleged contractor's lien for the balance due for the construction of a building. Sub-contractors intervened and sought affirmative relief claiming to be entitled to liens as direct contractors with the owner alleging that the plaintiff contractor was the agent of the owner and acted for the owner and not as an independent co..
The appeal in this case brings for review final decree in foreclosure of mortgage which decree contained the following findings of fact: "That the tax deed held by Cleo Bryan is null and void because it was a payment of taxes. That the mortgage sued on herein is owned by the complainant and there is due to the complainant the sum of $4,931.57, for principal and interest and an attorney's fee of $100.00, as provided in and by the said mortgage, all totaling the sum of $5,031.57." The appellant pre..
This is a rehearing of the consolidated cases decided and reported at 159 So. 2d 673 . That opinion did not discuss the facts upon which the decrees of the court were based, but was confined to the law on the case. Two separate causes were begun in the lower court. In one case, a taxpayer, the Spanish River Land Co., brought a bill in equity to restrain the town of Boca Raton, its officers and agents from raising or attempting to raise by taxation any moneys to pay principal or interest on accoun..
This is a rehearing of the consolidated cases decided and reported at 159 So. 2d 673 . That opinion did not discuss the facts upon which the decrees of the court were based, but was confined to the law on the case. Two separate causes were begun in the lower court. In one case, a taxpayer, the Spanish River Land Co., brought a bill in equity to restrain the town of Boca Raton, its officers and agents from raising or attempting to raise by taxation any moneys to pay principal or interest on accoun..
