welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Ricardo Torres, Jr.
Ricardo Torres, Jr.
Ricardo Torres, Jr.
Visitors: 28
1
Bar #381748(FL)     License for 41 years; Member in Good Standing
Miami FL

Are you Ricardo Torres, Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

18-2943  PHILIP WOOF v. ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL  (2019)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 03, 2019
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT PHILIP WOOF, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2943 ) ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed July 3, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Catherine M. Catlin, Judge. Philip Woof, pro se. Timothy G. Hayes, Lutz, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, LaROSE, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
1D07-4872  Plummer v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM EX REL. NILE  (2008)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 31, 2008 Citations: 986 So. 2d 606
986 So. 2d 606 (2008) PLUMMER v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM EX REL. NILE. No. 1D07-4872. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. July 31, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
70099  Brackenridge v. Ametek, Inc.  (1987)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 03, 1987 Citations: 517 So. 2d 667
517 So. 2d 667 (1987) William A. BRACKENRIDGE, Petitioner, v. AMETEK, INC. and Baring Industries, Inc., Respondents. No. 70099. Supreme Court of Florida. December 3, 1987. Rehearing Denied January 28, 1988. *668 Beth Tyler Vogelsang of the Vogelsang Law Firm, Miami, for petitioner. David C. Pollack and Ricardo Torres, Jr. of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, Miami, for Ametek, Inc. Law Offices of James O. Nelson, and Steven R. Berger and William G. Liston of Steven R. Berger, P.A., Miami, for Baring Ind..
01-004622PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs IRA S. JACOBSON, M.D.  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 04, 2001
The issue is whether Respondent's treatment of a patient diagnosed with a fecal impaction deviated from the applicable standard of care, in violation of Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove physician deviated from applicable standard of care when he ordered barium enema and prep for patient who expired three hours after tap water enema prep due to failure of weakened lower intestinal tract from undiagnosed cancer.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer