Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Richard I Wallsh
Richard I Wallsh
Visitors: 47
0
Bar #302295(FL)     License for 44 years
Orlando FL

Are you Richard I Wallsh? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

5D04-2783  Matajek v. Skowronska  (2005)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 18, 2005 Citations: 893 So. 2d 700
893 So. 2d 700 (2005) Stanislaw MATAJEK, a/k/a Stanley Matajek, Appellant, v. Leokadia SKOWRONSKA, Appellee. No. 5D04-2783. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. February 18, 2005. *701 Brian J. Almengual of Almengual & Treuhaft, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Louis Ossinsky, Jr., of Ossinsky and Krol, P.A., Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Attorney Brian J. Almengual filed a response to an order to show cause, issued by this court, as to why the appella..
KK-143  Bagley v. Brierton  (1978)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 05, 1978 Citations: 362 So. 2d 1048
362 So. 2d 1048 (1978) Philip George BAGLEY, Appellant, v. David BRIERTON, Superintendent Florida State Prison, Appellee. No. KK-143. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 5, 1978. *1049 Joseph Jordan of Bailey & Jordan, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant. Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn N. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. PER CURIAM. Appellant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus based on several grounds. The trial court denied the petition w..
381  Jackson v. State  (1958)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 27, 1958 Citations: 107 So. 2d 247
107 So. 2d 247 (1958) Earl Jake JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 381. District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District. August 27, 1958. Rehearing Denied October 21, 1958. *248 Rosenhouse & Rosenhouse, Carr & O'Quin, Miami, for appellant. Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Irving B. Levenson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. ALLEN, Acting Chief Judge. Earl Jake Jackson was found guilty of rape and recommended to mercy. Motion for new trial was denied and on May 20, 1957, h..
79-507, 79-1193, 79-1404, 79-1412, 79-2000 and 79-2001  Blum v. Blum  (1980)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 1980 Citations: 382 So. 2d 52
382 So. 2d 52 (1980) Harvey BLUM, Appellant, v. Carmen BLUM, Appellee. Carmen BLUM, Appellant, v. Harvey BLUM, Appellee. Nos. 79-507, 79-1193, 79-1404, 79-1412, 79-2000 and 79-2001. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 4, 1980. Rehearing Denied April 30, 1980. *53 Joseph Pardo, Miami, for Harvey Blum. Edward C. Vining, Jr., Miami, for Carmen Blum. Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SCHWARTZ, JJ. SCHWARTZ, Judge. On January 25, 1979, the lower court entered a final judgment of disso..
Y-111  Stallings v. State  (1975)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 10, 1975 Citations: 319 So. 2d 640
319 So. 2d 640 (1975) Raymond R. STALLINGS, Appellant (Defendant), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee (State). No. Y-111. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 10, 1975. *641 Raymond R. Stallings, in pro per. Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. MILLS, Judge. Stallings appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate and set aside the judgment and sentence adjudicating him guilty of second degree murder, and sentencing him to..
90-003628  DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING vs ROBERT W. BARNARD  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 13, 1990
The issue in this case is whether Respondent is guilty of assaulting his supervisor, in violation of Section 493.319(1)(j), Florida Statutes, and sleeping while on duty as a security guard, in violation of Section 493.319(1)(f), Florida Statutes.Six month suspension and $1000 fine for security guard's verbal assault of coworker
90-000738F  ROBERT W. BARNARD vs DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 1990
Petitioner, Robert W. Barnard, is requesting attorney's fees and costs, pursuant to Section 57.111, F.S., as a "prevailing small business party", by virtue of Respondent's voluntary dismissal of its administrative complaint seeking to revoke his Class "D" Watchman, Guard or Patrolman License, Number D88605626. The sole issues for determination are whether the actions of the agency were substantially justified or special circumstances exist which would make the award unjust.Fees and costs awarded in amount of $2808 when agency retroactively applied a licensing statute in violation of long-standing lease law

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer