Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Robert David Klausner
Robert David Klausner
Visitors: 53
0
Bar #244082(FL)     License for 48 years
Plantation FL

Are you Robert David Klausner? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 1.01120.56120.569120.57120.68121.052121.091185.0557.105

19-10995  Lucy E Simpson  (1987)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Dec. 21, 1987 Citations: 81 B.R. 144
81 B.R. 144 (1987) In re NAUTICA SPORTS CENTRE, INC., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 87-01179-BKC-TCB. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. December 21, 1987. Sandy Karlan, Miami, Fla., for debtor. Arthur S. Weitzner, Miami, Fla., for trustee. Jeanette E. Tavormina, North Miami, Fla., Trustee. Maitte R. Netsch, Miami, Fla., for Total-bank. ORDER SURCHARGING PORTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE THOMAS C. BRITTON, Chief Judge. The trustee's amended motion (C.P. No. 46) under 11 U.S.C. ยง 506(c) to sur..
11-002224F  DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT vs CITY OF WILTON MANORS  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 02, 2011
The issue for determination is whether DOAH has jurisdiction to entertain an agency's motion for attorney's fees brought pursuant to section 185.05(5), Florida Statutes, where the motion was filed with DOAH approximately two and one-half years after the agency's entry of a final order in the administrative proceeding for which the agency seeks an award of attorney's fees and costs.DOAH lacks jurisdiction to entertain a motion for attorney's fees pursaunt to section 185.05(5), where the motion was filed with DOAH approximately 2 and one-half years after the final order in the administrative proceeding for which the award is sought.
08-004766  CITY OF WILTON MANORS, FLORIDA, FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF WILTON MANORS PENSION PLAN FOR GENERAL EMPLOYEES AND POLICE vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 23, 2008
The issue in this case is whether a city, which sponsors a retirement plan covering its general employees and police officers, became ineligible to receive funds that the state distributes for the benefit of police pensions when, in 1999, the board of trustees for the retirement plan failed to hold an election affording the member police officers a chance to vote on whether a new plan for police officers only should be established.City's retirement plan was not rendered ineligible to receive premium tax distributions when the plan's board of trustees failed to hold an election, as required by statute, on whether a new plan should be established for police only.
04-004157  NATHANIEL GLOVER, JR. vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 18, 2004
The issue is whether payment of Petitioner's retirement benefits should have commenced after the filing of an application to retire with the Division of Retirement, with an effective date of April 1, 2004, or be retroactively changed to the date of his termination of employment, July 1, 2003.Petitioner is entitled to receive retirement benefits at the Elected Officers` Class rate of 3.0 percent per year of service, retroactive to July 1, 2003, the date of his termination of employment as Sheriff of Duval County.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer