welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Robert Hillard Hosay
Robert Hillard Hosay
Robert Hillard Hosay
Visitors: 57
1
License for 25 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Robert Hillard Hosay? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

13-003895BID  JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 10, 2013
Pursuant to chapter 287, Florida Statutes, and section 255.25, Florida Statutes,1/ the Department of Management Services (DMS) released an Invitation to Negotiate for a contract to provide tenant broker and real estate consulting services to the State of Florida under Invitation to Negotiate No. DMS-12/13-007 (ITN). After evaluating the replies, negotiating with five vendors, and holding public meetings, DMS posted a notice of intent to award a contract to CBRE, Inc. (CBRE) and Vertical Integration, Inc. (Vertical). At issue in this proceeding is whether DMS’s intended decision to award a contract for tenant broker and real estate consulting services to CBRE and Vertical is contrary to DMS’s governing statutes, its rules or policies, or the ITN’s specifications, or was otherwise clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioner challenged intended award of contract for tenant broker and real estate consulting services to competing vendors, but failed to prove that DMS's award decision was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious.
13-004113BID  CARE ACCESS PSN, LLC vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 2013
The issues in this bid protest are whether, in making the decision to award Intervenor Prestige Health Choice, LLC ("Prestige"), a contract to provide Medicaid managed medical assistance services as a provider service network in Region 11 (covering Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties), Respondent Agency for Health Care Administration ("AHCA") acted contrary to a governing statute, rule, or solicitation specification; and, if so, whether such action was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious. (In this protest, Petitioner Care Access PSN, LLC ("Care Access"), challenges AHCA's intended award to Prestige in Region 11, and only that award. Care Access does not seek to upset any other intended awards in Region 11 or in any other Region.)The agency's intended contract award, being contrary to the statutes and project specifications, is clearly erroneous and should be rescinded.
13-003028BID  GLOBAL TEL LINK CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 2013
Whether the Department of Corrections? action to withdraw its Intent to Award and to reject all replies to ITN 12-DC-8396 is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent, and if so, whether its Intent to Award is contrary to governing statutes, rules, policies, or the solicitation specifications.Petitioners failed to prove that the Department's rejection of all replies due to unclear criteria for award is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent.
13-003029BID  EMBARQ PAYPHONE SERVICES, INC., D/B/A CENTURYLINK vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 2013
Whether the Department of Corrections? action to withdraw its Intent to Award and to reject all replies to ITN 12-DC-8396 is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent, and if so, whether its Intent to Award is contrary to governing statutes, rules, policies, or the solicitation specifications.Petitioners failed to prove that the Department's rejection of all replies due to unclear criteria for award is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent.
13-003030BID  SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 2013
Whether the Department of Corrections? action to withdraw its Intent to Award and to reject all replies to ITN 12-DC-8396 is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent, and if so, whether its Intent to Award is contrary to governing statutes, rules, policies, or the solicitation specifications.Petitioners failed to prove that the Department's rejection of all replies due to unclear criteria for award is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent.
13-003041BID  GLOBAL TEL LINK CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 2013
Whether the Department of Corrections? action to withdraw its Intent to Award and to reject all replies to ITN 12-DC-8396 is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent, and if so, whether its Intent to Award is contrary to governing statutes, rules, policies, or the solicitation specifications.Petitioners failed to prove that the Department's rejection of all replies due to unclear criteria for award is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent.
13-000880BID  CCA OF TENNESSEE, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2013
Whether Invitation to Negotiate No. 12/13-010, issued by Respondent for the operation and management of Bay Correctional Facility, Graceville Correctional Facility, and Moore Haven Correctional Facility, is contrary to Respondent's governing statutes, rules, or policies.Petitioner proved the ITN specifications for operation and management of private correctional facilities was contrary to the governing statute, where errors were made in calculation of the per diem rates.
13-000706BID  LITTLE HAVANA ACTIVITIES AND NUTRITION CENTERS OF DADE COUNTY, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 22, 2013
The issues in the case are (1) whether the decision of the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) to not select Little Havana Activities and Nutrition Centers of Dade County, Inc. (Little Havana), for the award of a contract for the provision of long-term care managed care services pursuant to AHCA Invitation to Negotiation Solicitation No. AHCA ITN 011- 12/13, entitled "Statewide Medicaid Managed Care--Long Term Care, Region 11" (ITN) was contrary to the AHCA's governing statutes, rules, polices or any applicable ITN specification, and, if so, whether such selection decision was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious; whether Little Havana's response to the ITN was responsive; whether Little Havana was a responsible vendor; and (4) whether Little Havana's protest is barred for failure to submit the required protest bond.Protestor did not have standing to protest contract awards because it was neither responsive nor responsible.
11-005794BID  PRO TECH MONITORING, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 10, 2011
The issue in this case is whether Respondent's intended award of a contract to Intervenor pursuant to Request for Proposals No. 10-DC-8200 is contrary to Respondent's governing statutes, Respondent's rules and policies, and the specifications of the Request for Proposals.Petitioner proved that Intervenor's proposal contained material deviations from the terms, conditions and specifications of the RFP. The award of the contract to Intervenor was clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to competition.
11-003372BID  CTS AMERICA vs DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 11, 2011
The issue in this case is whether Respondent's intended award of a contract to Intervenor pursuant to Invitation to Negotiate No. 013-11 is contrary to Respondent's governing statutes, Respondent's rules and policies, and the specifications of the Invitation to Negotiate.Petitioner's proposal was non-responsive to the terms of the ITN. Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the proposals of the other vendors were non-responsive, or that the process was contrary to competition. Award of the contract to Intervenor upheld.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer