welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Robert Othell Beasley
Robert Othell Beasley
Robert Othell Beasley
Visitors: 53
4

Free consultations

Bar #148512(FL)     License for 27 years; Member in Good Standing
Pensacola FL

Are you Robert Othell Beasley? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Bankruptcy No. 97-4978-8B3  In Re Graffy  (1999)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: May 10, 1999 Citations: 233 B.R. 894
233 B.R. 894 (1999) In the Matter of Mark T. GRAFFY, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 97-4978-8B3. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. May 10, 1999. *895 B. Gray Gibbs, St. Petersburg, FL, for debtor. Terry E. Smith, Bradenton, FL, Trustee. John A. Galotto, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, D.C. ORDER GRANTING INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES THOMAS E. BAYNES, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge. BACKGROUND THIS CAUSE came on for hearing on the Application for Re..
12-001622  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs JAMES F. HOWARD CONSTRUCTION, INC.  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 07, 2012
The issue in this case is whether Respondent violated the provisions of chapter 440, Florida Statutes,1/ by failing to secure the payment of workers’ compensation, as alleged in the Stop-Work Order and Third Amended Order of Penalty Assessment.The Department did not prove that Respondent violated the provisions of chapter 440, Florida Statutes, by failing to secure the payment of workers' compensation as alleged in the Stop-Work Order and 3rd Amended Order of Penalty Assessment.
12-003491  MCARTHUR AND MYRNA EDWARDS vs HAMILTON GROUP FUNDING, INC.  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 23, 2012
Whether this case should be dismissed based on Petitioners’ failure to appear at the scheduled telephonic final hearing.Petitioners, who did not appear at scheduled telephonic final hearing, failed to prove Respondents discriminated against them in the sale of housing, or in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale, based on Petitioners' race.
12-003492  MCARTHUR AND MYRNA EDWARDS vs NICHOLAS HAMIC VENTURES, LLC.; BRISTOL GLOBAL MOBILITY; AND RICHARD J. AND MICHELLE COFFEY, PROPERTY OWNERS  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 23, 2012
Whether this case should be dismissed based on Petitioners’ failure to appear at the scheduled telephonic final hearing.Petitioners, who did not appear at scheduled telephonic final hearing, failed to prove Respondents discriminated against them in the sale of housing, or in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale, based on Petitioners' race.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer