The issue in this case is whether petitioner's claim against the bond posted by respondent with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services should be granted.Where seller made material misrepresentation, traveler entitled to a refund of money.
The issue in this case is whether petitioner's claim against the bond posted by respondent with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services should be granted.Claim against bond of seller of travel denied where there is no statutory violation.
The issue in this case is whether petitioner's claim against the bond posted by respondent with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services should be granted.Where misrepresentation on part of seller of travel, claim against bond approved.
The issue in this case is whether petitioner's claim against the bond posted by respondent with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services should be granted.Seller of travel liable for agent's misrepresentation; Claim against bond justified.
The issue in this case is whether petitioner's claim against the bond posted by respondent with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services should be granted.Seller of travel liable for acts of its third party promoter. Claim against bond justified.
The issue in this case is whether petitioner's claim against the bond posted by respondent with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services should be granted.Seller of travel liable for misrepresentation by its agent. Claim against bond justified.
The issue in this case is whether petitioner's claim against the bond posted by respondent with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services should be granted.Where seller of travel made a misrepresentation to traveler, claim against bond approved.
The issue in this case is whether petitioner's claim against the bond posted by respondent with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services should be granted.Seller of travel liable for misrepresentations made by agent
The issue in this case is whether petitioner's claim against the bond posted by respondent with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services should be granted.Bond covered claims of dissolved company where succesor assumed all libilities of predecessor.
Whether Petitioner is entitled to an award of attorney's fees against Respondent pursuant to Section 57.111, Florida Statutes.Prevailing party in dispute between a grower and licensed dealer in agricul- tural products not entitled to fees and costs against Department of Agriculture.
