Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Romualdo Cruz Marquinez, Jr.
Romualdo Cruz Marquinez, Jr.
Visitors: 35
0
Bar #109193(FL)     License for 27 years; Member in Good Standing
Jacksonville FL

Are you Romualdo Cruz Marquinez, Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

01-004406PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LARRY DEE THOMAS, M.D.  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 14, 2001
Whether Respondent's license as a physician should be disciplined for the alleged violation of Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, in that Respondent failed to practice medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances, by failing to treat the patient's preoperative coagulopathy and/or failing to use an alternate vein that would have allowed visualization of the shunt placement into the vein thereby reducing the risk of causing a hemorrhage given the patient's preoperative history, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove Respondent committed malpractice in 1994 by failing to treat patient`s pre-op coagulopathy and/or failed to use alternate vein during shunt placement, and in 1997 by failing to clean artery correctly during repair of aneurysm.
01-004407PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LARRY D. THOMAS, M.D.  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 14, 2001
Whether Respondent's license as a physician should be disciplined for the alleged violation of Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, by failing to practice medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances by failing to distally clamp part of the arteries prior to manipulation of the aneurysm and by failing to ensure periodic monitoring of the patient's condition postoperatively for evidence of ischemia or other problems and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove Respondent committed malpractice in 1994 by failing to treat patient`s pre-op coagulopathy and/or failed to use alternate vein during shunt placement, and in 1997 by failing to clean artery correctly during repair of aneurysm.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer