Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Ron D. Herman
Ron D. Herman
Visitors: 83
2

Free consultations

Bar #413161(FL)     License for 24 years; Member in Good Standing
West Palm Beach FL

Are you Ron D. Herman? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

16-2077  Gregory Wooden v. State of Florida  (2018)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 18, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D16-2077 _ GREGORY WOODEN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Mark W. Moseley, Judge. April 18, 2018 PER CURIAM. Gregory Wooden appeals his conviction for possession of narcotics, arguing that the traffic stop that led to his arrest was unconstitutionally prolonged in order to perform a dog sniff search. At approximately midnight on September 30, 2015, Wooden was driving on I-75 wh..
1D08-6351  Ratliff v. State  (2009)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 26, 2009 Citations: 6 So. 3d 59
6 So. 3d 59 (2009) RATLIFF v. STATE. No. 1D08-6351. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. March 26, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
4D05-4704  Lopez v. State  (2006)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 06, 2006 Citations: 944 So. 2d 373
944 So. 2d 373 (2006) LOPEZ v. STATE. No. 4D05-4704. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. December 6, 2006. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
09-000997  GLORIA NYE vs SUMMER TREES SOUTH HOA, INC.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 20, 2009
Whether Respondent Homeowners Association discriminated against Petitioner on the basis of Petitioner's handicap/disability (deafness).Request for free services unrelated to a handicap is not a request for accommodation. Request for accommodation must be specific enough for Respondent to grant or deny before a denial is found to have occurred.
94-000264  JOHN M. HATCHER vs CITY OF GAINESVILLE AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 13, 1994
The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Respondent discriminated against the Petitioner by allegedly terminating his employment because of a handicap. Embodied within that issue is the question of whether the Petitioner is "handicapped" for purposes of Chapter 760, Florida Statutes, and other relevant law.Petitioner did not prove impairment of major life activity, so no handicap. Did not show still qualified for same job, therefore no prima facie case.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer