welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Russell Dewayne Castleberry
Russell Dewayne Castleberry
Russell Dewayne Castleberry
Visitors: 37
0
Bar #275859(FL)     License for 46 years; Member in Good Standing
Palatka FL

Are you Russell Dewayne Castleberry? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

07-005107GM  COUNTY OF VOLUSIA; THOMAS STEVENS; ALMA MAE BUCKHALT; AND MARGARET BENNETT RAULERSON vs DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PUTNAM COUNTY  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 07, 2007
The issue in this case is whether the amendment to the Putnam County Comprehensive Plan adopted pursuant to Ordinance 2007-27, as modified by Ordinance 2008-32, is “in compliance,” as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2008).1/Petitioners failed to prove beyond fair debate that Putnam County's comprehensive plan amendment was not "in compliance."
09-003597GM  BONNIE CONKLIN AND WENDY GOODSON vs PUTNAM COUNTY, FLORIDA  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 09, 2009
The issue in this case is whether the amendment to the Putnam County Comprehensive Plan adopted by Ordinance 2009-23 is "in compliance," as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2008).1/Petitioners proved that the proposed amendment is not in compliance because it locates an industrial use in a rural residential neighborhood with inadequate road access.
06-000929EPP  IN RE: SEMINOLE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE SEMINOLE GENERATING STATION UNIT 3 POWER PLANT SITING APPLICATION NUMBER PA 78-10A2 vs *  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 16, 2006
The issue to be resolved in this portion of this power plant site certification proceeding is whether the site for the proposed Seminole Generating Station Unit 3 Project is consistent and in compliance with the applicable land use plans and zoning ordinances of Putnam County, Florida, pursuant to Section 403.508(2), Florida Statutes.1The site for expansion of Seminole Electric Power Plant was consistent and in compliance with the Putnam County land use plan and zoning.
02-001069GM  FRANCES Z. PARSONS vs PUTNAM COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 14, 2002
Whether the amendment to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Putnam County Comprehensive Plan (Plan) adopted by Ordinance No. 2001-33 on December 11, 2001, which changes the future land use designation on the FLUM of an approximately 29-acre site from "Rural Residential" to "Commercial," is "in compliance" as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes, for the reasons set forth in the Petition for Administrative Hearing.The amendment to Putnam County`s Future Land Use Map, changing the site from "Rural Residential" to "Commercial," is not "in compliance" with Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, and this conclusion is not fairly debatable.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer