Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Scott Arland Glass
Scott Arland Glass
Visitors: 51
0
Bar #911364(FL)     License for 33 years; Member in Good Standing
Orlando FL

Are you Scott Arland Glass? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

16-004556GM  SEERINA FARRELL, ARIEL HORNER, ADELE SIMONS, MARJORIE HOLT, RONALD BROOKE, KELLY SEMRAD, AND CORNER LAKES ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. vs ORANGE COUNTY  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 11, 2016
Whether Orange County Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2015-2- P-FLUE-1 and 2015-2-A-5-1, adopted by Ordinance 2016-17 on July 12, 2016 (the Plan Amendments), are “in compliance,” as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2016).1/Petitioners proved beyond fair debate that the plan amendments were internally inconsistent with the comprehensive plan by allowing urban development in the rural service area.
16-006165  INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT vs ALL ABOARD FLORIDA - OPERATIONS, LLC; RAM LAND HOLDINGS, LLC; J. ACQUISITIONS BREVARD, LLC; AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 20, 2016
The issue to be determined in this case is whether All Aboard Florida – Operations, LLC (“the Applicant”); Ram Land Holdings, LLC (“RLH”); and J. Acquisitions Brevard, LLC (“JAB”), are entitled to the Environmental Resource Permit (“ERP”) issued by the St. Johns River Water Management District (“SJRWMD”) for construction and operation of certain railway facilities within the portion of the Florida East Coast Railway corridor known as Segment D08 (the “Project”).Petitioner did not demonstrate that the new bridges would cause flooding that would not already occur during a 100-year storm because of the height of the existing bridges.
10-009137DRI  GINN-LA MARINA, LLLP, LTD, NORTHSHORE HAMMOCK LTD, LLLP, AND NORTHSHORE OCEAN HAMMOCK INVESTMENT, LTD, LLLP vs FLAGLER COUNTY  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 21, 2010
The issues are: (1) what are the correct procedures and substantive criteria to be applied in reviewing Petitioners' proposed "local" changes to the Hammock Dunes Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order (DO); (2) does Petitioners' application satisfy the applicable criteria for approval; and (3) do Petitioners or Respondent, Flagler County (County), have the legal ability or obligation through the Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) to the DO to change certain obligations of Intervenor, Admiral Corporation (Admiral), contained in the DO and in separate agreements related to the performance of certain DO obligations.NOPC partially denied because revisions not consistent with comprehensive plan and LDRs and applicants had no vested right to develop land dedicated to golf course usage.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer