Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Scott Edward Clodfelter
Scott Edward Clodfelter
Visitors: 36
0
Bar #382231(FL)     License for 41 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Scott Edward Clodfelter? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

98-005623BID  RATTLER CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 24, 1998
The issue is whether the Department of Corrections' decision to select Intervenor as construction manager on Project No. VO- 04-CM was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious, as alleged by Petitioner.Failure by challenger to file required items in Request for Proposal rendered its proposal non-responsive; all bids non-responsive.
98-003733BID  TOMLINSON INSTRUMENTS AND CONTROLS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 21, 1998
The issue is whether the decision by the Florida Department of Corrections to award contracts for items numbered 2-5, 7-8 and 12 of Invitation to Bid No. 98-INST-7188 to Willo Products Company, Inc. should be upheld.Petitioner did not show that Department of Corrections (DOC) favored Intervenor in awarding a contract for a portion of the items included in the Invitation to Bid (ITB).
98-003711BID  INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT COUNSEL, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 20, 1998
Whether a contract exists for the lease of office space in Shalimar, Florida, between the Department of Corrections (DOC) and International Investment Counsel, Inc. (IIC).Once the time for protest has passed the following notification of bid award, a contract is formed between the agency and winning bidder.
97-001397BID  E. L. COLE PHOTOGRAPHY, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 18, 1997
The issue for consideration in this case is whether Petitioner, E. L. Cole Photography, Inc., was properly denied award of Bid Number 97-DC-7059, to provide photographic film to the Department.Unsuccessful bidder failed to show agency rejection of his BID and acceptance of low bidder was incorrect legally.
96-005570BID  ROCHE DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 22, 1996
The issue is whether Respondent Department of Corrections acted in a manner contrary to its governing statutes, rules or policies, or the bid specifications in giving notice of its intent to award the contract for Invitation to Bid No. 96-DC- 6847R to Intervenor Behring Diagnostics, Inc.Petitioner did not have standing to challenge award of contract. Contract was awarded in settlement of BID dispute.
96-001449BID  AMERICAN STERILIZER COMPANY (AMSCO) vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 26, 1996
Whether MDT Technology's bid for Invitation to Bid No. 96-NFRC-0001 RC was unresponsive and therefore, whether the Department of Corrections erred in its intent to award the contract to MDT Technology.Agency arbitrarily departed from requirements of invitation to bid.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer