Duval FL Employee benefits, Litigation and Transportation La -- eLawyers

96-1310 (1997)

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: Mar. 12, 1997 Citations: 108 F.3d 1372

108 F.3d 1372 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Athilla Maria HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA; Anton S. Gardner, County Manager; Ron Carlee, Director, De Partment of Human Services; Susanne Eisner, Department of Human Services; Kitty Clark, Depar..

93-2485 (1995)

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: Apr. 19, 1995 Citations: 52 F.3d 56

52 F.3d 56 99 Ed. Law Rep. 761 Diana G. CORNS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RUSSELL COUNTY VIRGINIA SCHOOL BOARD; Larry A. Massie, individually, and in his official capacity as Division Superintendent; Roger D. Sword, individually, and in his official capacity as a member of the Russell County School Board; Hugh Barrett, individually, and in his official capacity as a member of the Russell County School Board; Harold Mitchell, individually, and in his official capacity as a member of the Russell County..

93-2054 (1994)

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: Sep. 28, 1994

36 F.3d 1092 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Marye Elizabeth ISH, Plaintiff Appellant, v. ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA; Anton Gardner, County Manager, In his official and individual capacities; William L. Hughes, Past Director, In his official and individual capacities; Alan Ch..

91-1644 (1992)

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: Jul. 24, 1992

968 F.2d 1211 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Lorene H. BOSTIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RUSSELL COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD; Roger L. Taylor, Individually and as principal of Lebanon Elementary School; G. B. Meade, Individually and as Vice-Chairman of the Russell County School Board;..

90-1014 Matthew B. Goodall, an Infant by His Father and Next Friend, Robert B. Goodall Robert B. Goodall Kathleen N. Goodall v. Stafford County School Board (1991)

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: Apr. 11, 1991 Citations: 930 F.2d 363

930 F.2d 363 59 USLW 2659, 67 Ed. Law Rep. 79 Matthew B. GOODALL, an infant by his father and next friend, Robert B. GOODALL; Robert B. Goodall; Kathleen N. Goodall, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STAFFORD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-1014. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued Jan. 10, 1991. Decided April 11, 1991. Robert Brandt Goodall, argued, Easterling & Goodall, Stafford, Va., for plaintiffsappellants. Scott Sanford Cairns, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Ric..

88-3169 Linda H. Keziah v. W.M. Brown & Son, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation (1989)

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: Aug. 28, 1989 Citations: 888 F.2d 322

888 F.2d 322 51 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 134 , 29 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 862, 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,468, 113 Lab.Cas. P 35,281 Linda H. KEZIAH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W.M. BROWN & SON, INCORPORATED, a Virginia Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 88-3169. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued March 8, 1989. Decided Aug. 28, 1989. Joyce Murphy Brooks, Charlotte, N.C., for plaintiff-appellant. Scott Sanford Cairns (Thomas G. Hardy, III, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmon..

90-1723 (1990)

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: Dec. 19, 1990 Citations: 921 F.2d 50

921 F.2d 50 John W. DENNISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA; Kenneth Y. Stiles, individually and in his capacity as Chairman of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors; John R. Riley, individually and in his capacity as County Administrator of Frederick County, Virginia, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-1723. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued Oct. 30, 1990. Decided Dec. 19, 1990. Thomas A. Schultz, Jr., Harrison & Johnston, Winchester, Va., for plaintiff..

02-12201 Gonzalez-Sanchez v. International Paper Company (2003)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Sep. 25, 2003 Citations: 346 F.3d 1017

346 F.3d 1017 Flavio GONZALEZ-SANCHEZ, Timoteo Lopez-Solis, Rafael Martinez-Ramirez, Francisco Jarquin-Ramirez, Jeronimo Lucas-Garcia, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, Union Camp Corporation, Defendants-Appellees, IP Forest Resources Company, et al., Defendants. No. 02-12201. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. September 25, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Mary Catherine Bauer, James M. Knoepp, Virginia Justice Center for Farm and Immigrant Workers, Charlottes..

96-1310 Harris v. Arlington County Va (1997)

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: Mar. 12, 1997

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1310 ATHILLA MARIA HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA; ANTON S. GARDNER, County Manager; RON CARLEE, Director, De- partment of Human Services; SUSANNE EISNER, Department of Human Services; KITTY CLARK, Department of Personnel; KAY WEST, Department of Human Services; MARSHA ALLGEIER, Department of Human Services; CECILIA TANNER, Department of Human Services; WALTER ZAUMSEIL, Department of Human S..

15-006955BID GILLY VENDING, INC. vs BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MIAMI-DADE COLLEGE (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 08, 2015

Whether Respondent's intended decision to award a vending services contract to Compass Group USA, Inc., d/b/a Canteen Vending Services, is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious. Also at issue is whether Respondent's intended decision is void or must be set aside due to alleged violations of Florida's Sunshine Law during the procurement process.Petitioner failed to prove that the procurement process for vending services utilized by the Respondent violated the law, and likewise failed to prove that there was a Sunshine Law violation which would have warranted setting aside the award.

Scott Sanford Cairns