Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Sharmin R Hibbert
Sharmin R Hibbert
Visitors: 91
0
Bar #32569(FL)     License for 19 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Sharmin R Hibbert? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

19-005210F  LEE LIGHTSEY vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 30, 2019
Is an Agency that settles a challenge to its denial of a license by agreeing to issue the license a "non-prevailing adverse party," as defined by section 120.595(1)(e)3., Florida Statutes (2019)? 1Notice of intended agency action is not a paper filed in a "proceeding." Therefore no fees available under ยง120.569(2)(e) for Notice of Intent allegedly issued for an improper purpose.
15-006246PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF HEARING AID SPECIALISTS vs ROSALYN RUNAE JOHNSON WHITE, H.A.S.  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 05, 2015
Whether Respondent violated the provisions of chapter 484, Florida Statutes (2010),1/ regulating hearing aid specialists, as alleged in the Third Amended Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what is the appropriate sanction.Respondent's active procurement of significant financial transfers to herself and her company during the course of professional relationship with a 93-year-old man with memory problems constituted exploitation.
11-000546PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ALBERT ZAMEK, M.D.  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 02, 2011
The issues in this case are whether Respondent committed the allegations contained in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Clear and convincing evidence that Respondent committed a record-keeping violation and made deceptive or untrue representations in or related to the practice of medicine. Recommend letter of concern, $5,000 fine, and continuing education.
13-002097F  HERBERT R. SLAVIN, M.D. vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 11, 2013
Whether Petitioner, Dr. Herbert R. Slavin, is entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs in an amount not exceeding $50,000 pursuant to section 57.111, Florida Statutes (2011).Petition for attorney's fees denied where applicant failed to demonstrate status as a small business party.
12-000079PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs HERBERT R. SLAVIN, M.D.  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 06, 2012
The issues in this case are whether Respondent committed the allegations contained in the Amended Administrative Complaint, and if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner failed to adduce clear and convincing evidence that Respondent's treatment of patient with desiccated thyroid medication constituted a departure from the standard of care. Recommend dismissal of Amended Administrative Complaint.
12-000358PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs OSCAR RAMIREZ, M.D.  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 23, 2012
The issues in this case are whether Respondent, whose license to practice medicine was revoked in Maryland on a malpractice charge, is guilty in Florida of the offense of being disciplined in another jurisdiction; and if so, whether Petitioner should impose discipline on Respondent's medical license within the applicable penalty guidelines or take some other action.Respondent, whose license to practice medicine was revoked in Maryland on a malpractice charge, is guilty in Florida of the offense of being disciplined in another jurisdiction, but the penalty should be reduced based on mitigating circumstances.
11-003138PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOSEPH PIOTROWSKI, P.A.  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 21, 2011
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent is a licensed physician's assistant in Florida; whether he committed the allegations alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, what penalty should be imposed?Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent was convicted of DUI manslaughter and failed to notify the Board. Recommend revocation.
11-000052PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LOWELL ANTHONY ADKINS, M.D.  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 07, 2011
The issues in this case are whether Respondent, a physician, failed to adhere to the applicable level of care in prescribing controlled substances; failed to follow standards for the use of controlled substances for the treatment of pain; and failed to keep legible medical records justifying the course of a patient's treatment; if so, whether Petitioner should impose discipline on Respondent's medical license within the applicable penalty guidelines or take some other action.Respondent was not shown to have violated the applicable level of care in prescribing controlled substances, or to have failed to follow the applicable practice standards, but he failed to keep legible medical records, warranting disciplinary action.
09-005267PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LEONARD ABRAHAM RUBINSTEIN, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 25, 2009
The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated sections 458.331(1)(t), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(n), Florida Statutes (2004), and section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2006), and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Doctor's surgery hours were excessive for cosmetic procedures; doctor recommended and scheduled unnecessary surgery; and doctor used undue influence to get patient to undergo unneccessary allergy testing.
09-005269PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LEONARD ABRAHAM RUBINSTEIN, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 25, 2009
The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated sections 458.331(1)(t), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(n), Florida Statutes (2004), and section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2006), and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Doctor's surgery hours were excessive for cosmetic procedures; doctor recommended and scheduled unnecessary surgery; and doctor used undue influence to get patient to undergo unneccessary allergy testing.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer