Whether amendments to the City of Bonita Springs Comprehensive Plan, adopted by Ordinance 17-08 (Ordinance) on June 7, 2017, are "in compliance," as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2017).1/The City of Bonita Springs determination that Ordinance 17-08 is in compliance under section 163.3184 is fairly debatable. The Petitioner did not prove beyond fair debate that the Ordinance is not in compliance.
The issues to be determined in these consolidated cases are whether All Aboard Florida – Operations, LLC (“the Applicant”), and Florida East Coast Railway, LLC (“FECR”), are entitled to an Environmental Resource Permit Modification authorizing the construction of a stormwater management system and related activities to serve railway facilities, and a verification of exemption for work to be done at 23 roadway crossings (collectively referred to as “the project”).Applicants demonstrated their entitlement to an Environmental Resource Permit Modification and a Verification of Exemption for a stormwater management system to serve express passenger train facilities.
Applicants demonstrated their entitlement to an Environmental Resource Permit Modification and a Verification of Exemption for a stormwater management system to serve express passenger train facilities.
The issue in this case is whether Respondent KW Resort Utilities Corp. ("KWRU") is entitled to issuance, by Respondent Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"), of Domestic Wastewater Facility Permit FLA014951-012-DWIP and UIC Permits 18490-020 and 18490-021 (collectively, the "Permit at Issue"), authorizing the major modification of KWRU's existing permit to operate a domestic wastewater facility located at 6630 Front Street, Stock Island, Florida 33040. The Permit at Issue would authorize the expansion of KWRU's existing domestic wastewater facility and the installation of two additional underground injection wells.Petitioners did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondent failed to provide reasonable assurance entitling it to issuance of the challenged permit. Recommend issuance of the permit.
The issue to be determined in this case is whether Sabal Trail is entitled to the proposed Environmental Resource Permit and Easement to Use Sovereign Submerged Lands to construct a natural gas pipeline.Petitioner failed to establish standing as an association. Respondent Sabal Trail proved its entitlement to an Environmental Resource Permit and authorization to use sovereign submerged lands for a natural gas transmission pipeline.
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether Respondent Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority ("FKAA") is entitled to issuance, by Respondent Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"), of permit numbers 295404-018-DWC/CM ("Permit 18"), 295404-019-DWC/CM ("Permit 19"), 295404-025-DWC/CM ("Permit 25"), and 295404-027- DWC/CM ("Permit 27") (hereafter "Permits at Issue") authorizing the dryline construction of domestic wastewater collection and transmission systems in the lower Florida Keys.1/Petitioners did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondent failed to provide reasonable assurance entitling it to issuance of wastewater collection systems permits. Recommend issuance of permits.
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether Respondent Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority ("FKAA") is entitled to issuance, by Respondent Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"), of permit numbers 295404-018-DWC/CM ("Permit 18"), 295404-019-DWC/CM ("Permit 19"), 295404-025-DWC/CM ("Permit 25"), and 295404-027- DWC/CM ("Permit 27") (hereafter "Permits at Issue") authorizing the dryline construction of domestic wastewater collection and transmission systems in the lower Florida Keys.1/Petitioners did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondent failed to provide reasonable assurance entitling it to issuance of wastewater collection systems permits. Recommend issuance of permits.
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether Respondent Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority ("FKAA") is entitled to issuance, by Respondent Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"), of permit numbers 295404-018-DWC/CM ("Permit 18"), 295404-019-DWC/CM ("Permit 19"), 295404-025-DWC/CM ("Permit 25"), and 295404-027- DWC/CM ("Permit 27") (hereafter "Permits at Issue") authorizing the dryline construction of domestic wastewater collection and transmission systems in the lower Florida Keys.1/Petitioners did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondent failed to provide reasonable assurance entitling it to issuance of wastewater collection systems permits. Recommend issuance of permits.
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether Respondent Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority ("FKAA") is entitled to issuance, by Respondent Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"), of permit numbers 295404-018-DWC/CM ("Permit 18"), 295404-019-DWC/CM ("Permit 19"), 295404-025-DWC/CM ("Permit 25"), and 295404-027- DWC/CM ("Permit 27") (hereafter "Permits at Issue") authorizing the dryline construction of domestic wastewater collection and transmission systems in the lower Florida Keys.1/Petitioners did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondent failed to provide reasonable assurance entitling it to issuance of wastewater collection systems permits. Recommend issuance of permits.
The issue to be determined in this case is whether the proposed amendment to Florida Administrative Code Rule 62-555.360 of the Department of Environmental Protection (“Department”), pertaining to cross-connection control for public water systems, is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Petitioner failed to prove that the Department's rule regulating cross-connection control for public water systems was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
