Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Staci Braswell Sims
Staci Braswell Sims
Visitors: 32
0
Bar #28845(FL)     License for 19 years; Member in Good Standing
Gainesville FL

Are you Staci Braswell Sims? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

07-003511PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ANTHONY BRIGNONI, M.D.  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 30, 2007
The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated Subsection 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2002),1 and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent did not violate standard-of-care when he did not specify the strength of acetic acid to be used in surgery.
09-005267PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LEONARD ABRAHAM RUBINSTEIN, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 25, 2009
The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated sections 458.331(1)(t), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(n), Florida Statutes (2004), and section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2006), and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Doctor's surgery hours were excessive for cosmetic procedures; doctor recommended and scheduled unnecessary surgery; and doctor used undue influence to get patient to undergo unneccessary allergy testing.
09-005269PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LEONARD ABRAHAM RUBINSTEIN, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 25, 2009
The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated sections 458.331(1)(t), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(n), Florida Statutes (2004), and section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2006), and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Doctor's surgery hours were excessive for cosmetic procedures; doctor recommended and scheduled unnecessary surgery; and doctor used undue influence to get patient to undergo unneccessary allergy testing.
09-005270PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LEONARD ABRAHAM RUBINSTEIN, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 25, 2009
The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated sections 458.331(1)(t), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(n), Florida Statutes (2004), and section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2006), and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Doctor's surgery hours were excessive for cosmetic procedures; doctor recommended and scheduled unnecessary surgery; and doctor used undue influence to get patient to undergo unneccessary allergy testing.
09-003628PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ASHRAF ELSAKR, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 09, 2009
The question presented is whether Respondent violated Section 456.072(1)(bb), Florida Statutes (2006), or Section 458.331(1)(nn), Florida Statutes (2006), by means of violating Florida Administrative Code Rule 64B8-9.007(2)(b), and if so, what penalty should be imposed?The Department proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent failed to adhere to the pause rule and operated on the wrong patient. Mitigating factors were present.
07-003609PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOHN B. MILTON, M.D.  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 09, 2007
Should discipline be imposed against Respondent's license to practice medicine for violation of Section 458.331(1)(m) and (t), Florida Statutes (2005)?Respondent did not violate the standard of care in diagnosis and treatment provided.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer