533 F. Supp. 86 (1981) Bill GUNTER, Insurance Commissioner, State of Florida, Plaintiff, v. AGO INTERNATIONAL B. V., a Netherlands corporation; et al., Defendants. No. TCA 81-1014. United States District Court, N. D. Florida, Tallahassee Division. December 3, 1981. *87 Allan J. Katz, Asst. Insurance Commissioner, S. Strom Maxwell, Raymond F. Behling, Chief Atty., Dept. of Insurance, Tallahassee, Fla., for plaintiff. H. Michael Madsen, Messer, Rhodes & Vickers, Tallahassee, Fla., Allan Pepper, Kay..

22 B.R. 826 (1982) In re The DE ROCHFORT CO. LTD., Debtor. The DE ROCHFORT CO. LTD., Plaintiff, v. SUNSHINE STATE BANK, etc., Defendant, Cloensa Corp., Intervenor. Bankruptcy No. 82-00923-BKC-TCB, Adv. No. 82-0592-BKC-TCB-A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. August 24, 1982. *827 Stanley P. Cohen, Waldaboro, Maine, for Cloensa. Richard R. Booth, Miami, Fla., for Sunshine. A.M. Schwitalla, Coral Gables, Fla., for debtor. ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL THOMAS C. BRITTON, Bankruptcy Judg..

The issue is whether the City of Miami's small scale development amendment adopted by Ordinance No. 12776 on March 2, 2006,1 is in compliance, as defined by Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2005).2Petitioners did not prove that the City`s future land use map amendment in the Miami River corridor from Industrial to Restricted Commercial was inconsistent with the City Comprehensive Plan, or not supported by data and analysis.

On or about August 13, 1984, Mr. Arnold Belkin petitioned the Division of Florida Land Sales, Condominiums and Mobile Homes for the issuance of a declaratory statement. Thereafter, on October 2, 1984, a Joint Motion to Intervene and Request for Public Hearing was filed with that agency by certain limited partnerships that own units in the condominium building that was the subject of Mr. Belkin's petition. The Joint Motion to Intervene was granted by order rendered by the Division Director on October 22, 1984. Thereafter, due to existence of possible factual disputes, the matter was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings for a formal hearing. The issues raised by Mr. Belkin's petition for a declaratory statement may be summarized as follows: Whether the limited partnerships that ultimately became the Joint Intervenors in this case constitute a developer as defined by Section 718.103(14), Florida Statutes; Whether the alleged use by Hall Management Company of a condominium unit as a rental office constitutes a violation of certain portions of the declaration of condominium; and If the Joint Intervenors are determined to constitute a successor developer, whether they are entitled to control the board of administration of the condominium association pursuant to Section 718.301, Florida Statutes. Subsequent to the formal hearing a transcript of the proceedings at the hearing was filed with the Hearing Officer and thereafter all parties filed post-hearing submissions containing proposed findings of fact, proposed conclusions of law, proposed recommended disposition of this matter, and legal arguments. In the formulation of this Recommended Order, I have given careful consideration to all of the post-hearing documents submitted by all of the parties. Specific rulings on all proposed findings of fact submitted by all parties are contained in the Appendix which is attached to and incorporated into this Recommended Order.Evidence shows that joint intervenors were concurrent and successor developers of condominium.