Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Stephen Marc Slepin
Stephen Marc Slepin
Visitors: 66
0
Bar #100290(FL)     License for 57 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Stephen Marc Slepin? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :
86-003996  MARIO ALBERTO ALMEIDA vs. BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS  (1986)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 26, 1987
An unintentional misrepresentation or omission is insufficient to support a charge of fraudulent misrepresentation. Petitioner should sit for licensing exam.
83-001205  BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS vs. ALI AZIMA  (1983)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jan. 12, 1985
Respondent performed incomplete abortion and inserted Intra Uterine Device (IUD) in pregnant woman is guilty of violating Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes. Recommend suspension for one year.
80-000044  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES vs. WESTCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL  (1980)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Apr. 14, 1984
Whether Westchester General Hospital's exemption for HRS Certificate of Need review should be forfeited or revoked because of failure to take actions required for preservation of its exemption.Respondent should lose grandfather exemption Certificate of Need (CON) except for doctrine of equitable estoppel. Give Respondent six months to act to preserve exemption.
83-002965  BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS vs. VALARIA A. ALSINA  (1983)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Mar. 14, 1984
Respondent made false/fraudulent representations in practice of medicine regarding blood tests. Six months license suspension recommended.
82-001733  BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS vs. MANUEL J. RICO-PEREZ  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Aug. 21, 1983
Complaint dismissed where charges of excessive fees based only on billing statements and not on medical records and special equipment utilized.
82-000846  SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION vs. APPALACHIAN COMPUTER SERVICES, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SERVICES  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Aug. 19, 1982
The matters for consideration in this case concern Petitioner's challenge to Respondent Department of Labor and Employment Security's award of a contract for delivery of computer services to the bidder, Respondent Appalachian, to the exclusion of petitioner. The contract is also known as a Request For Proposal and is identified as RFP WC-82-1. In particular, Petitioner contends that the award of contract was improper because Petitioner was the low bidder; the RFP was inadequate; there was insufficient dialogue after the bidders' conference; the agency failed to evaluate SDC's primary and alternate proposal and an informal hearing of February 3, 1982, resulted in a recommended order rejecting the award of the bid to Appalachian.Petitioner failed to prove the bid was improperly awarded to Respondent corporation. Deny petition.
80-001565RX  FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF HOME HEALTH AGENCIES, INC., AND GULF COAST HOME HEALTH SERVICE vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1980)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jan. 13, 1981
This matter came on for hoaring in Tallahassee, Florida, before the Division of Administrative Hearings by its duly designated Hearing Officer, Robert T. Benton, II, on September 17, 1980, and went over into the following day at the end of which the matter was continued until October 28, 1980. By stipulation of the parties time for entry of the final order was extended until 60 days after receipt of the transcript of proceedings. The Division of Administrative Hearings received the transcript on November 17, 19130. The parties were represented by counsel:Petitioners didn't apply for a CON under the challenged rules because of costs involved. Recommend dismissal for lack of standing.
75-001564  BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS vs. HERMANN BUENO  (1975)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Nov. 23, 1976
Respondent's license was revoked in another state and so it must be revoked here too.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer