Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Stephen Mark Todd
Stephen Mark Todd
Visitors: 49
0
Bar #886203(FL)     License for 33 years
Tampa FL

Are you Stephen Mark Todd? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

17-003106  DAVID RIGGINS vs HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 25, 2017
Whether Petitioner, David Riggins, was subject to an unlawful employment practice by Respondent, Hillsborough County, based on his disability (handicap) in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent discriminated against him based on his disability or in retaliation for his actions. Further, Respondent presented a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its employment decision.
14-002801RP  FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES, ALACHUA COUNTY, BAY COUNTY, BREVARD COUNTY, CHARLOTTE COUNTY, COLLIER COUNTY, ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLAGLER COUNTY, HERNANDO COUNTY, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, LAKE COUNTY, LEE COUNTY, LEON COUNTY, MANATEE COUNTY, ET AL. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 16, 2014
This is a rule challenge brought pursuant to section 120.56, Florida Statutes,1/ to the Proposed Rules of the Department of Juvenile Justice (“Department” or “DJJ”) 63G- 1.011, 63G-1.013, 63G-1.016, and 63G-1.017 (the “Proposed Rules”). The main issue in this case is whether the Proposed Rules are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority in that the Proposed Rules enlarge, modify, or contravene the specific provisions of law implemented, section 985.686, Florida Statutes; are vague; and/or are arbitrary and capricious. Petitioners also argue that the Proposed Rules impose regulatory costs that could be addressed by the adoption of a less costly alternative. Finally, Petitioners assert that the Proposed Rules apply an invalid interpretation of the General Appropriations Act (“GAA”) for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2014-15 by interpreting the GAA as a modification to substantive law, contrary to the Constitution of the State of Florida.Some, but not all, of the challenged provisions of the Department of Juvenile Justice's proposed rules governing cost sharing between state and counties for secure juvenile detention are invalid.
10-003166  BROWARD COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 10, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-001893  MIAMI-DADE COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-001894  SANTA ROSA COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-001895  ALACHUA COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-001896  ORANGE COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-001945  PINELLAS COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 13, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-002194  ESCAMBIA COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 22, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-002195  HERNANDO COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 22, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer