Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Steven Michael Blickensderfer
Steven Michael Blickensderfer
Visitors: 36
0
Bar #92701(FL)     License for 13 years
Miami FL

Are you Steven Michael Blickensderfer? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

SC13-1958  State of Florida v. Michael Perez  (2014)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 16, 2014
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC13-1958 _ STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. MICHAEL PEREZ, Respondent. [October 16, 2014] PER CURIAM. Following the issuance of the Third District Court of Appeal’s opinion in Perez v. State, 118 So. 3d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013), and upon the State’s motion, the district court certified the following question as one of great public importance: HOW SHOULD MANIFEST INJUSTICE BE DEFINED FOR PURPOSES OF A CLAIM OF NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE AFTER A GUILTY PLEA Perez v. S..
20-002967  FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY vs FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 29, 2020
Whether Respondent, Florida Power & Light Company, is entitled to the renewal of Permit No. FL0001562-012-IW1N, the combined Industrial Wastewater/National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit for the continued operation of the Turkey Point Cooling Canal System.Applicant for renewal of industrial wastewater permit provided reasonable assurance the project would meet all applicable statutory and rule requirements. Challengers to issuance of permit failed to meet their burden of proof under section 120.569(2)(p).
20-002968  FLORIDA KEYS FISHING GUIDES ASSOCIATION, INC. vs FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 29, 2020
Whether Respondent, Florida Power & Light Company, is entitled to the renewal of Permit No. FL0001562-012-IW1N, the combined Industrial Wastewater/National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit for the continued operation of the Turkey Point Cooling Canal System.Applicant for renewal of industrial wastewater permit provided reasonable assurance the project would meet all applicable statutory and rule requirements. Challengers to issuance of permit failed to meet their burden of proof under section 120.569(2)(p).

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer