Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Susan Carolyn Marvin
Susan Carolyn Marvin
Visitors: 37
0
Bar #718319(FL)     License for 37 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Susan Carolyn Marvin? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

  Stanley v. Stanley  (1947)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jan. 10, 1947 Citations: 158 Fla. 402, 28 So. 2d 694
This controversy brings for review an order bearing date of June 7, 1946, requiring appellant to pay doctor bills in amount of $75.00 incurred in behalf of one of his minor sons, and increasing from $100.00 to $150.00 per month the support money to be by him paid for each of his two sons, such increase to begin on the 10th day of November 1945. The contending parties were divorced by decree of the Circuit Court, Dade County, Florida, on July 31, 1942. The decree expressly adopted an agreement bet..
  Hysler v. State  (1939)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Feb. 20, 1939 Citations: 136 Fla. 563, 187 So. 261
The petitioner, Clyde Hysler, was tried and convicted of murder in the first degree in April, 1937. That judgment and conviction was affirmed by this Court February 3, 1938; petition for rehearing was subsequently denied and the date of his execution was set by the Governor for the week beginning February 20, 1939. He now applies for a stay order and a writ of habeas corpus to withhold the execution of the death penalty because (1) he was convicted as principal in the second degree and the princi..
SC14-1852    (2015)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2015
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC14-1852 _ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE; FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE; NEW FLORIDA RULES FOR COURT-APPOINTED ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION NEUTRALS. [October 8, 2015] PER CURIAM. This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure and proposed new Florida Rules for Court-Appointed Alternative Dispute Resolution Neutrals Rega..
90-006664F  DONALD L. HILGEMAN, D/B/A DLH ENTERPRISES vs FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 22, 1990
The issues in this case concern the attempt by Petitioner to collect $11,684.62 in attorneys fees and costs associated with the defense of the case of State of Florida, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Florida Land Sales, Condominiums and Mobile Homes, Petitioner, vs. Donald L. Hilgeman and Marilyn Hilgeman, d/b/a DLH Enterprises; and Pat Montgomery, as park owners of Lake Waldena Resort, Respondents, DOAH Case No. 89-4100, and $931.50 in attorneys fees and costs attributable to the pursuit of the present case to collect those attorneys fees and costs attributable to the defense of the administrative prosecution. See Section 57.111, Florida Statutes.Fees and costs denied. Although disciplinary order did not impose a penalty there was a finding adverse to claimant, thus the denial.
89-004100  FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES vs DONALD L. HILGEMAN AND MARILYN HILGEMAN, D/B/A DLH ENTERPRISES, AND PAT MONTGOMERY, AS PARK OWNERS OF LAKE WALDENA RESORT  (1989)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 31, 1989
The is sues concern allegations set forth in a notice to show cause/administrative complaint by which Petitioner has accused Respondents of violation of Section 723.037(3), Florida Statutes, and Rule 7D-32.004(1), Florida Administrative Code, in that they are said to have refused to meet with the designated homeowners' committee within 30 days of giving notice of a lot rental increase after having been requested to do so. The purpose of that meeting would have been to discuss the reasons for the increase in lot rental.Held that respondent did not act inappropriately in the employed to increase lot rentals in mobile home park.
89-006598RX  DONALD L. HILGEMAN, D/B/A DLH ENTERPRISES, LAKE WALDENA RESORT vs DIVISION OF LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES  (1989)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 27, 1989
The issues for consideration in this case concern the petition and challenge to the validity of Rule 7D-32.001(4); Rule 7D-32.003 and Rules 7D- 32.004(1) and (2), Florida Administrative Code. The basis for the challenge is premised upon an alleged vagueness, inadequacy in the establishment of standards for agency decisions, the vesting of unbridled discretion in the agency and the contention that the rules are arbitrary and capricious.Preamble to Rules held invalid as they enlarge 723.037(3)FS. Rule 7D-32.001 (4),7D-3.32.004(1) and balance of 7D-32.003 upheld.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer