Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Susan Ellen Dietrich
Susan Ellen Dietrich
Visitors: 58
0
Bar #770795(FL)     License for 37 years; Member in Good Standing
Sanford FL

Are you Susan Ellen Dietrich? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

10-001893  MIAMI-DADE COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-001894  SANTA ROSA COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-001895  ALACHUA COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-001896  ORANGE COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-001945  PINELLAS COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 13, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-002194  ESCAMBIA COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 22, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-002195  HERNANDO COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 22, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-003166  BROWARD COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 10, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
90-004175  GARY L. GANDY vs ANTHONY CEROSIMO AND SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 02, 1990
Whether the applicant, Respondent Cersosimo can give reasonable assurances that the surface water management system as presently designed by the applicant and requested to be permitted will not diminish the capability of Lake Mabel in Polk County, Florida, to fluctuate through the full range established for it in Chapter 40D-8, Florida Administrative Code, in view of the fact that the floor elevation of the retention ponds is one-half foot below the elevation of the surface of Lake Mabel for the ten year flood warning level.Evidence sufficient to show that reasonable assurances were given to allow pre-development/post-dev. match for basin run off

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer