Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Susan Leslie Forbes Clark
Susan Leslie Forbes Clark
Visitors: 21
0
Bar #179580(FL)     License for 50 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Susan Leslie Forbes Clark? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

SC15-780    (2015)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 22, 2015
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC15-780 _ ADVISORY OPINION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE: LIMITS OR PREVENTS BARRIERS TO LOCAL SOLAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY. _ No. SC15-890 _ ADVISORY OPINION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE: LIMITS OR PREVENTS BARRIERS TO LOCAL SOLAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY (FINANCIAL IMPACT STATEMENT). [October 22, 2015] PER CURIAM. The Attorney General of Florida has petitioned this Court for an advisory opinion as to the validity of a citizen initiative amendment to the Florida Constitution, ti..
14-001398BID  PINNACLE RIO, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intended decision to award low-income housing tax credits in Miami-Dade County through Request for Applications 2013-003 to HTG Miami-Dade 5, LLC, and Allapattah Trace Apartments, Ltd., is contrary to governing statutes, the corporation’s rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications.Respondent's determination that Petitioner APC Four Forty Four was ineligible was clearly erroneous, but Petitioners failed to prove Respondent's intended allocation of tax credits was contrary to governing statutes, rules, or solicitation specifications.
14-001399BID  PINNACLE RIO, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intended decision to award low-income housing tax credits in Miami-Dade County through Request for Applications 2013-003 to HTG Miami-Dade 5, LLC, and Allapattah Trace Apartments, Ltd., is contrary to governing statutes, the corporation’s rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications.Respondent's determination that Petitioner APC Four Forty Four was ineligible was clearly erroneous, but Petitioners failed to prove Respondent's intended allocation of tax credits was contrary to governing statutes, rules, or solicitation specifications.
14-001400BID  TOWN CENTER PHASE TWO, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intended decision to award low-income housing tax credits in Miami-Dade County through Request for Applications 2013-003 to HTG Miami-Dade 5, LLC, and Allapattah Trace Apartments, Ltd., is contrary to governing statutes, the corporation’s rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications.Respondent's determination that Petitioner APC Four Forty Four was ineligible was clearly erroneous, but Petitioners failed to prove Respondent's intended allocation of tax credits was contrary to governing statutes, rules, or solicitation specifications.
14-001428BID  APC FOUR FORTY FOUR, LTD. vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intended decision to award low-income housing tax credits in Miami-Dade County through Request for Applications 2013-003 to HTG Miami-Dade 5, LLC, and Allapattah Trace Apartments, Ltd., is contrary to governing statutes, the corporation’s rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications.Respondent's determination that Petitioner APC Four Forty Four was ineligible was clearly erroneous, but Petitioners failed to prove Respondent's intended allocation of tax credits was contrary to governing statutes, rules, or solicitation specifications.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer