welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Susan Patricia Stephens
Susan Patricia Stephens
Susan Patricia Stephens
Visitors: 46
0
Bar #710652(FL)     License for 38 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Susan Patricia Stephens? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

17-004349BID  VARIETY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, D/B/A NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 02, 2017
Whether the Department of Health's ("Department") intended award of the contract under Request for Proposals DOH16-028, Local Early Step ("LES") Program offices ("the RFP"), to Intervenor A.W. Holdings, LLC, d/b/a Benchmark Human Services ("Benchmark"), is contrary to the Department's governing statutes, rules, policies or the specifications of the RFP, and is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious.The Petitioner did not prove that the Department's intended award to the Intervenor of the Department's Local Early Step program was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious.
12-003170BID  LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 26, 2012
At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent, Department of Health ("Department"), acted contrary to the agency's governing statutes, rules or policies, or the bid specifications in its proposed decision to award the contract for Invitation to Bid No. DOH 12-007 (the "ITB") to Intervenor Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc. ("Quest").Award of contract to low bidder was not clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious; requirement that bidder "identify" key personnel was satisfied by detailed list of job descriptions that did not name specific current employees.
11-001670BID  K AND M PINE STRAW vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 04, 2011
The issue in this proceeding is whether the award of a bid for the sale of scrap metal to Cumbaa Enterprises, Inc. was arbitrary, capricious, clearly erroneous, or contrary to competition or the bid specifications.Evidence did not demonstrate that omitted copy of back side of boilerplate form that DOC already had was material even though technically required by bid specs. since signatures were contained on the front side that was submitted.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer