534 F. Supp. 17 (1982) The UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner/Counterdefendant, v. AIR FLORIDA, INC., Respondent/Counterclaimant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD, its Chairman Robert J. Brown, Member Robert O. Harris, Individually and Collectively as its Members, and its Executive Secretary, Rowland K. Quinn, Jr.; Air Line Employees Association, International; The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO; and the Negotiating Committee of the A..
741 So. 2d 634 (1999) Carlos MARRERO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 99-1987. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. September 29, 1999. Carlos Marrero, in proper person. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before NESBITT, GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Carlos Marrero (defendant) appeals from an order of the trial court denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. He contends that the t..
Did sexual harassment of Petitioner, Tania Aponte (Ms. Aponte), if any, create a hostile work environment? Did Respondent, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Watson) discriminate against Ms. Aponte based on her gender by terminating her employment in March 2009? Did Watson retaliate against Ms. Aponte for complaining about alleged sexual harassment?Employer discharged employee for chronic absenteeism, not on account of her gender or as retaliation for an unfounded complaint of sexual harassment. The employee's supervisor did not subject her to sexual harrasment. Employee did not prove her claims.
The issue is whether Respondent engaged in an unlawful employment practice by discriminating against Petitioner and retaliating against him because he complained of racial discrimination.Petitioner was demoted for unwillingness to assume responsibility of supervisor, not in retaliation for his claim of racial discrimination.
Whether Respondent committed the unlawful employment practices alleged in the employment discrimination complaint Petitioner filed with the Florida Commission on Human Relations (FCHR) and, if so, what relief should Petitioner be granted.Petitioner failed to prove that he was victim of employment discrimination based on race and national origin; neither did he prove he was a victim of unlawful retaliation for having engaged in protected activity.
The issue in this case concerns whether the Respondent,1 Norwood Elementary After School Program, should be fined $200.00 for violation of licensing standards applicable to childcare facilities as alleged in the Charging Document dated December 20, 2001.Evidence was insufficient to establish that Respondent had imposed inappropriate discipline on a child.
