Free initial consultation
Are you The Smith Family Law Firm, P.A.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page
Post on Jan. 15, 2012
RMC, Grandmother v. D.C. Father (January 6, 2012) 1st DCAAfter trial court judge in adoption proceeding made assertions regarding Petitioner’s counsel going to the media, counsel moved to recuse the judge in the instant case and several other cases (in separate motions alleging the same facts)....
Post on Jan. 15, 2012
RMC, Grandmother v. D.C. Father (January 6, 2012) 1st DCAAfter trial court judge in adoption proceeding made assertions regarding Petitioner’s counsel going to the media, counsel moved to recuse the judge in the instant case and several other cases (in separate motions alleging the same facts)....
Post on Jan. 09, 2012
The Smith Family Law Firm, P.A. "Roy's Desk" 407 790 4800 815 Orienta Ave., Suite 2050 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701www.LessStressDivorce.com FIRST FAMILY LAW APPELLATE OPINION OF 2012 Middleton v. Middleton (5th DCA) 1/6/12: IMPUTATION OF INCOME The trial court erred, as a matter of law, in...
Post on Dec. 09, 2011
The Smith Family Law Firm, P.A. "Roy's Desk" 407 790 4800 815 Orienta Ave., Suite 2050 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 www.LessStressDivorce.com Beasley v. Beasley (4th DCA) 12/7/11: ALIMONY * BRIDGE THE GAP * JEWELRY * 401 K In this case involving a 21 year marriage, the trial court’s award of only...
Post on Dec. 03, 2011
407 790 4800Altamonte Springs, FL 32701Sullivan v. Hoff-Sullivan (First DCA) 12/2/11 A creditors attempt to pierce the claim of homestead rightfully failed. The creditor attempted to claim that the sale of the marital home and disbursement of proceeds under the MSA did not evidence a good faith...
Post on Nov. 23, 2011
The Smith Family Law Firm, P.A. 407 790 4800 www.TheSmithFamilyLawFirm.com Short Week. Happy Thanksgiving! Rushetsky v. Rushetsky (4th DCA) 11/23/11 Except as to points where wife conceded error, the failure to provide a transcript or proper substitute required affirmance unless there is clear...
Post on Nov. 18, 2011
Tuomey v. Tuomey (Fla 5th DCA) 11/18/11 A final judgment is facially erroneous, requiring remand, where it does not make any findings as to the net income of each party as a starting point for calculating child support or explain how the calculation was performed Mata v.Mata (Fla 3rd DCA) 11/16/11...
Post on Nov. 18, 2011
Week of November 7, 2011 Hernandez v. Fronter: 4th DCA 11/9/11: It was error for trial court to permit such an extended and delayed repayment of child support arrearages. ($20 a month to satisfy $18,499.75 arrearage would have resulted in payments until child was 29). Wu v. Xing: 3rd DCA 11/9/11:...
